A. SAVAGE & ORS. VS O. UWECHIA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

A. SAVAGE & ORS. VS O. UWECHIA

FASASI ADESHINA VS THE FEDERAL PUBLIC TRUSTEE & ORS
August 22, 2025
BAADON KPAA VS THE STATE
August 22, 2025
FASASI ADESHINA VS THE FEDERAL PUBLIC TRUSTEE & ORS
August 22, 2025
BAADON KPAA VS THE STATE
August 22, 2025
Show all

A. SAVAGE & ORS. VS O. UWECHIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2022-04) Legalpedia 82731 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Abuja

Thu Mar 30, 1972

Suit Number: SC 517/65

CORAM


LEWIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAI-WILLIAMS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


A.SAVAGE

SOLOMON KAYODE

S. ROTIBI(Trustees of the WILL of S.O. Rotibi)

APPELLANTS 


O. UWECHIA

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


WILL – PROBATE – SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE – EXECUTORS – CONTRACT – RES JUDICATA – WAIVER

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff loaned one S.O. Rotibi some money who promised to repay same within three months and gave the plaintiff a promissory note to that effect, but he died a week later leaving a Will wherein the defendants were appointed as his executors.

 


HELD


The Court held that the learned trial Judge erred in law in holding that the cause of action in the two cases is not substantially the same. The appeal is therefore allowed and the judgment of the learned trial Judge in suit No. O/10/62 delivered in the Onitsha High Court on 4th October, 1963, including the order as to costs, is hereby set aside.

 


ISSUES


None.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DEFINITION OF CAUSE OF ACTION


1. “A cause of action is defined in Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary as the entire set of circumstances giving rise to an enforceable claim. To our mind, it is, in effect, the fact or combination of facts which give rise to a right to sue and it consists of two elements – the wrongful act of the defendant which gives the plaintiff his cause of complaint and the consequent damage.” FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC.

 


RES JUDICATA: WHEN INAPPLICABLE


2. “It is trite law that a former judgment cannot operate as a bar to any subsequent proceedings between the same parties unless those proceedings are founded upon the same cause of action.” FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC.

 


CASES CITED


1. Savage v. Uwechia (1961) 1 All ER 830

2. Brunsden v. Humphery (1884) 14 QBD 141

3. Cooke v. Gill (1873) LRSCP 107

4. Read v. Brown (1888) 22 QBD 128 (C.A.)

5. Kusada v. Sokoto Native Authority, SC. 131/68

6. Brunsden v. Humphrey (1884) 14 QBD 141.

7. Cahoon v. Franks (1967) 63 DLR (2nd) 274

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Halsbury’s Laws of England, 3rd Ed. Vol.

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.