BAKER MARINE NIGERIA LIMITED V. CHEVRON NIGERIA LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

BAKER MARINE NIGERIA LIMITED V. CHEVRON NIGERIA LIMITED

MUDA ANWOYI V. & ORS V JOHN BANKOLE SHODEKE
June 5, 2025
MR. MOSES BUNGE V. THE GOVERNOR OF RIVERS STATE & ORS
June 5, 2025
MUDA ANWOYI V. & ORS V JOHN BANKOLE SHODEKE
June 5, 2025
MR. MOSES BUNGE V. THE GOVERNOR OF RIVERS STATE & ORS
June 5, 2025
Show all

BAKER MARINE NIGERIA LIMITED V. CHEVRON NIGERIA LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2006) Legalpedia (SC) 15651

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 9, 2006

Suit Number: SC. 374/2001

CORAM


SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

HON. JUSTICE K.M.O. KEKERE- EKUN    JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


BAKER MARINE NIGERIA LIMITED APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

A matter for arbitration between the parties to this appeal was referred to an arbitration panel. The decision of the panel was not satisfactory to the respondent, so it went to the Federal High Court for an order that the award be set aside, or an order refusing the enforcement of the award. The Federal High Court granted the application and set aside the award of the panel. Equally, the substantial damages of US$750,000 payment awarded was set aside. Aggrieved by the decision, the respondent appealed to the Court of Appeal. The court found the appeal devoid of merit, and dismissed it. Aggrieved again, the respondent/appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


The appeal lacked substance and merit and was dismissed.


ISSUES


Whether there is an error on the face of the award as to justify the order of the court below confirming the order of the Federal High Court which set aside the damages, of US$750,000 awarded by the Arbitrators in favor of the Appellant.

Whether damages for the tort of conspiracy as opposed to that for breach of contract can be at large and aggravated.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


A COURT OR TRIBUNAL CANNOT WRITE A NEW CONTRACT FOR THE PARTIES


“In the interpretation of contracts or documents, the basic principle of law, is that, it is not the duty of any court or tribunal, to make contracts for the parties. Contracts, as a rule, are made by the parties thereto who are bound by the terms thereof and the court are always reluctant, to read into a contract, terms on which there is no agreement.” Per I.F. OGBUAGU, JSC


CASES CITED


Fakorede & Ors. V. Attorney-General of Western State (1972) 1 ALL NLR 178 at 189.
Alhaji Baba v, Nigerian Civil Aviation Training Centre & Anor. (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt 192) 388 at 413 (1991) 7 SCNJ. 1.
Aouad V. Kessrawani (1956) SCNLR 83; (1956) 1 FSC 35.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.