JOHN KOBINA SEYE JOHNSON & ORS V. IRELE AYINKE LAWANSON & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

JOHN KOBINA SEYE JOHNSON & ORS V. IRELE AYINKE LAWANSON & ORS

EWO AKANG VS THE STATE
August 27, 2025
SWISS AIR TRANSPORT CO. LTD V. THE AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 27, 2025
EWO AKANG VS THE STATE
August 27, 2025
SWISS AIR TRANSPORT CO. LTD V. THE AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 27, 2025
Show all

JOHN KOBINA SEYE JOHNSON & ORS V. IRELE AYINKE LAWANSON & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1971) Legalpedia (SC) 31228

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 12, 1971

Suit Number: SC 44/1970

CORAM


COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

LEWIS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


JOHN KOBINA SEYE JOHNSON & ORS APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The property in dispute was left by one Salu Ariyo who died testate. The receiver, acting in pursuance of an order of court, sold the parcel of land to one Emmanuel Johnson. The land also lies within the stool lands of the Oloto Chieftaincy Family who has conveyed the land to various owners with the respondents being the current owner with certificate of title duly endorsed.


HELD


The Court declared that the recital in the document, exhibit M, vis-a-vis the proceedings, carries no presumption in favour of the appellants in as much as it is neither referred nor referrable to any contract occurring at least 20 years, posterior to the date of its execution.


ISSUES


The only point now being decided at this stage of the appeal is the meaning of section 129 of the Evidence Act


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE 20 YEARS PRESUMPTION RULE


The plain position is that the occurrence in the course of the title of a deed more than 20 years old when the contract of sale is in hand of statements of fact or recitals material to the prior title, will be prima facie evidence in favour of that prior title and unless disputed will be sufficient evidence of those statements of fact or recitals. Per Coker, JSC


LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION


It is the alphabet of his study to every lawyer that in the exercise of statutory construction words must first be given their ordinary and natural meaning and no words should be discarded or regarded as surplusage without sound reasons. Per Coker, JSC


CASES CITED


Maurice Goualin Ltd. and Anor. v. Wahabi Alanda Aminu (Privy Council appeal No. 17 of 1957)

Bolton v. London School Board (1878) 7 Ch D 766

Re Wallis and Grouts contract (1906) 2 Ch. 206

Odeneye v. Savage

Nuru Williams v. Adamo Akinwunmi,

Isaac Sylvanus John v. Hector O. Adebanlo,

Samuel A. Omosanya v. A.G. Anifowoshe (1950) 4 FSC. 94


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Vendor and Purchaser Act, 1874


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.