A. OKOSUN OKPERE & FAMILY VS EBOADE EHINEBO & ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

A. OKOSUN OKPERE & FAMILY VS EBOADE EHINEBO & ANOR

S. O. N. OKAFOR & SONS LTD VS NIGERIA HOUSING DEV SOCIETY LTD. & ANOR
August 22, 2025
FATAYO OJULE & ORS VS B. A FATOLA OKOYA
August 22, 2025
S. O. N. OKAFOR & SONS LTD VS NIGERIA HOUSING DEV SOCIETY LTD. & ANOR
August 22, 2025
FATAYO OJULE & ORS VS B. A FATOLA OKOYA
August 22, 2025
Show all

A. OKOSUN OKPERE & FAMILY VS EBOADE EHINEBO & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 55111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 28, 1972

Suit Number: SC 102/70

CORAM


ELIAS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAYI-WILLIAMS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO A.G. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


A. OKOSUN OKPERE & FAMILY APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiff commence the action claiming among others title to land, that the land in dispute is a devised portion of a large property belonging to his late father now belongs to him. Both parties sought to rely on different judicial decisions to prove their title, both decision were discovered to be marred with serious irregularities. Consequently, a retrial of the case denovo was ordered by another judge of the same court and the decision of the customary court was set aside.


HELD


The learned trial judge was right to have ordered a fresh trial of the case in view of the irregularities in the trial process which offend the principle of natural justice but it was wrong to have ordered that the matter be tried de novo by another judge of the same court.


ISSUES


Whether the learned judge had power to order that the case be reheard in the High Court.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHERE IRREGULARITIES OF COURT OFFEND THE PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE


In the face of glaring irregularities which offend the principle of natural justice at the trial of a case, the proper thing for an appellate court to do in such circumstance is to order a retrial of the case. PER COKER JSC


ORDER OF TRIAL DE-NOVO


A judge sitting in appellate capacity can only order that a matter be tried de novo by the court of first instance or before any magistrate court and not another judge of the same court. PER COKER JSC


CASES CITED


Amoku v. Duro 14 WACA 257.

Apena v. Shorusi 9 WACA 95

Lateju v. Iyanda and another (1959) 4 FSC 257


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Customary Courts Edict of the Mid-Western State (No. 38 of1966)

Native Courts Ordinance (Cap. 142 in the Laws of Nigeria, 1948)

Supreme Court Act (No. 12 of 1960)


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.