SIMON EDIBO V THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

SIMON EDIBO V THE STATE

FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NIGERIA V MR. I.A. ENAIFOGHE GOLD
June 3, 2025
S.O. NTUKS & ORS V NIGERIAN PORTS AUTHORITY
June 3, 2025
FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NIGERIA V MR. I.A. ENAIFOGHE GOLD
June 3, 2025
S.O. NTUKS & ORS V NIGERIAN PORTS AUTHORITY
June 3, 2025
Show all

SIMON EDIBO V THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2007) Legalpedia (SC) 76521

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 11, 2007

Suit Number: SC.284/2003

CORAM


PIUS OLAYIWOLA ADEREMI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.

PIUS OLAYIWOLA ADEREMI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.

PIUS OLAYIWOLA ADEREMI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.

PIUS OLAYIWOLA ADEREMI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.


PARTIES


SIMON EDIBO APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant acting on radio information from the police command that a robbery had taken place pursued and murdered two of the alleged robbers, but it was found that the radio message was false. They were charged with conspiracy and culpable homicide punishable with death and were convcicted.


HELD


The Supreme Court held that the taking of the Appellant’s plea in the judge’s chamber was unconstitutional


ISSUES


1. Whether the Court below was right in affirming the decision of the trial court to the effect that the force used by the Appellant was far in excess of what was reasonably necessary to effect arrest.

2. Whether the Court below was right when it held that taking the plea of the Appellant in chambers by the learned trial judge is not unconstitutional.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


AN ACCUSED IS ENTITLED TO ALL DEFENCE EVEN IF IT WAS NOT RAISED BY HIM


“It is settled law that in criminal trials the court is not confined to considering only the defences raised by an accused person. An accused person in a criminal trial is entitled to any defence which, on the totality of the evidence, is available to him whether or not he specifically raised it himself. And the court including an Appellate court has a duty to carefully consider the entire evidence and give an accused person the benefit of any defence available therein to him notwithstanding the fact that it was not raised by him.” – Per Tabai, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Gabriel v. The State (1989) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 122) 457 at 464
2. Chime v. Ude (1996) 7 NWLR (Pt. 461) 379
3. Sanmabo v. The State (1967) N.M.L.R. 314,


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The 1999 Nigerian Constitution

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.