SALIHU OKINO VS YAKUBU OBANEBIRA & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

SALIHU OKINO VS YAKUBU OBANEBIRA & ORS

RICHARD IGAGO VS THE STATE
June 26, 2025
SAEBY JERNSTOBERI MASKINFABRIC A/S V OLAOGUN ENTERPRISES LTD.
June 26, 2025
RICHARD IGAGO VS THE STATE
June 26, 2025
SAEBY JERNSTOBERI MASKINFABRIC A/S V OLAOGUN ENTERPRISES LTD.
June 26, 2025
Show all

SALIHU OKINO VS YAKUBU OBANEBIRA & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (SC) 51871

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 3, 1999

Suit Number: SUIT No: SC. 258/1993

CORAM


M.E. OGUNDARE – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

A.G. KARIBI-WHYTE – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S.U. ONU – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

A.I. IGUH – JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


SALIHU OKINO(For Ezionogu Clan of Eganyi) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiffs’ case, briefly, is that they are the owners of the five pieces or parcels of farm land in dispute known as and called Usoko, Igege, Uhomiri, Ogane and Uwowiri. They claimed that they were therefore entitled to all compensation payable by the 2nd Defendant in respect of parts of the farm lands in dispute affected by the Ajaokuta- Itakpe rail line. They prayed for the order of court in terms of their claims. ?


HELD


That the opinion of Uthman Mohammed was duly pronounced and the evidence before the Court was properly evaluated ?


ISSUES


(i) Whether the Court of Appeal was properly constituted when it delivered its judgment in the appeal on the 9th day of June, 1993. (ii) Whether the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the subject matter of this appeal is legally valid, constitutional and/or otherwise unimpeachable.(iii) Whether the Court of Appeal was right to have set aside the judgments of the Appellate High Court and the trial Upper Area Court to order a retrial of the suit.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHEN A JUDGMENT WILL BE GIVEN WITHOUT JURISDICTION


where the opinion of an absent Justice even though written at a time he was a member of the relevant court is read as against being pronounced after he had ceased to be a member of such relevant court by elevation to a higher bench, death, dismissal or retirement, such an opinion would be given without jurisdiction and would consequently be a nullity.-Per Anthony I. Iguh JSC


PRESUMPTION OF REGULARITY


The legal presumption of regularity, omnia praesumutur rite esse acta which principally, is applied to judicial and official acts. per Anthony I. Iguh JSC


CASES CITED


Akinloye and Another v Eyiyola and others (1968) NMLR. 92 at 95Alhaji Aminu Ishola v Societe Generale Bank (Nig.) Ltd. (1997) 2 NWLR(Pt. 488) 405Amadi v Nwosu (1992) 5 NWLR (Part 241) 273 of 280


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Court of Appeal Act, 1976The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.