PIUS NWAOGA VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

PIUS NWAOGA VS THE STATE

BENDEL CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD VS ANGLOCAN DEVELOPMENT CO (NIG.) LTD
August 23, 2025
ELEKTROTECHNISCHE FABRIK SCHMIDT VS BATERIA SLANY NARODNI PODNIC
August 26, 2025
BENDEL CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD VS ANGLOCAN DEVELOPMENT CO (NIG.) LTD
August 23, 2025
ELEKTROTECHNISCHE FABRIK SCHMIDT VS BATERIA SLANY NARODNI PODNIC
August 26, 2025
Show all

PIUS NWAOGA VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 87817

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 3, 1972

Suit Number: SC.345/1970

CORAM


ADEMOLA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

LEWIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

FATAYI-WILLIAMS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


PIUS NWAOGA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Accused/Appellant was convicted of murder of a fellow rebel soldier, by following the construction of a superior officer. However as the offence was committed when the accused was wearing plain clothes and not army uniform and manifestly illegal his conviction was upheld and the appeal dismissed.


HELD


The court held that deliberate and intentional killing of an unarmed person having peacefully inside the Federal territory as in this case is a crime against humanity and even if committed during a civil war is in violation of the domestic law of the country.


ISSUES


Whether the defence of superior ordered can avail a soldier who commits murder.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CONTRADISTINCTION BETWEEN ENEMY SOLDIERS AND ENEMY INDIVIDUALS


“Enemy soldiers- in contradistinction to promote enemy individuals- may only be punished for such acts when they have committed them during their stay within a belligerent lines under disguise.”


SOLDIERS ARE BOUND BY BOTH MILITARY AND CIVIL LAW


“A soldier is responsible by military and civil law and it is monstrous to suppose that a soldier could be protected when the order is grossly and manifestly illegal”- Per Ademola CJN.


CASES CITED


Keighly vs. Bell (1866) 176 En Rep 781 at p. 793 R vs.

Smith (1900) 177 SCR 56C


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Criminal Code


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.