OSUN STATE GOVERNMENT V DALAMI NIGERIA LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OSUN STATE GOVERNMENT V DALAMI NIGERIA LIMITED

SOKOTO STATE GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA & 2 ORS V KAMDEX NIGERIA LIMITED
June 4, 2025
AMINU MOHAMMED & ANOR V THE STATE
June 4, 2025
SOKOTO STATE GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA & 2 ORS V KAMDEX NIGERIA LIMITED
June 4, 2025
AMINU MOHAMMED & ANOR V THE STATE
June 4, 2025
Show all

OSUN STATE GOVERNMENT V DALAMI NIGERIA LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2007) Legalpedia (SC) 11132

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 2, 2007

Suit Number: SC. 277/2002

CORAM


JOHN INYANG OKORO CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE    JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

JOHN INYANG OKORO CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE    JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE,SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


OSUN STATE GOVERNMENT. APPELLANTS


 DALAMI NIGERIA LIMITED

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Respondent was a party to a Management Operation Lease Agreement. The Appellant became the successor of the Oyo State Government in the lease and by a resolution of its Legislative arm, the Leasehold was terminated. The Respondent sought special and general damages but the Appellant appealed.


HELD


The Supreme Court held that the Oyo State High Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter but that the respondent were only entitled to damages as contained in their agreement.


ISSUES


1.  Whether the High Court of Justice of Oyo State was competent and possessed the jurisdiction to exercise judicial powers over the claims of the Respondent and whether the Court of Appeal properly considered the issue of jurisdiction in determination of the Appeal.2. Whether the Court of Appeal properly considered and determined the damages awarded against the Appellant


RATIONES DECIDENDI


QUANTUM OF DAMAGES IS ASSESSED BY THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES.


“Parties are bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement they freely entered into, it means that the rights of the aggrieved lessee and the quantum of damages recoverable for termination of the agreement is strictly limited to what is provided for in the agreement between the parties and nothing more” W.S.N. ONNOGHEN, JSC


DOES THE LIMITATION LAW OF PUBLIC OFFICERS APPLY IN CASES OF CONTRACT?


“It is now settled law that section 2 of the Public Officers (Protection) Act does not apply to cases of contract.” KATSINA-ALU, JSC


DOES THE LIMITATION LAW OF PUBLIC OFFICERS APPLY IN CASES OF CONTRACT?


“Where a statute provides for the institution of an action within a prescribed period, proceedings shall not be brought after the time prescribed by such statute. Any action that is commenced after the prescribed period is said to be statute barred.” KATSINA-ALU, JSC


WHAT GUIDES A COURT IN DETERMINING JURISDICTION?


“The guide in the determination of jurisdiction of a court is the subject matter of the claim as endorsed in the writ of summons. It is a fundamental principle of law that it is the claim of the plaintiff that determines the jurisdiction of the court which entertains the claim” KATSINA-ALU, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Ibrahim v. JSC (1998) 14 NWLR (Pt.584) 12. Nigerian Ports Authority v. Construzioni General Farsura Cogefar Spa & Anor. (1974)1 ALL N.L.R. 4633. Adeyemi v. Opeyori (1976) 1 FNLR 1494. Aouad v. Kessrawani [1956] 1 F.S.C. 35.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.