OSHINJINRIN & ORS VS ALHAJI ELIAS & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OSHINJINRIN & ORS VS ALHAJI ELIAS & ORS

ONWUKA VS THE STATE
August 28, 2025
GOLD ATITI V. OSASEREN
August 29, 2025
ONWUKA VS THE STATE
August 28, 2025
GOLD ATITI V. OSASEREN
August 29, 2025
Show all

OSHINJINRIN & ORS VS ALHAJI ELIAS & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1970) Legalpedia (SC) 12353

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT LAGOS

Fri Apr 3, 1970

Suit Number: SC 63/1966

CORAM


COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UDO-UDOMA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


OSHINJINRIN & ORS

APPELLANTS 


ALHAJI ELIAS & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


TORT- TRESSPASS

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

 Judgement was given against the Appellants in the trial Court for trespass and cause of damages to the Respondent’s property. The trial Court also granted an order for perpetual injunction against the Appellants restraining them from further trespass.

 


HELD


The Court held that the judgment appealed against in this case did not give double compensation in respect of any particular item of injury and that the award of general damages in this case is not improper.

 


ISSUES


Whether it was wrong to award any general damages in favour of the plaintiffs inasmuch as the plaintiffs had already been compensated for all their loss by way of special damages

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF OF SPECIAL DAMAGES IN TORT


“Undoubtedly the rule that special damages must be strictly proved applies to cases of tort. In effect the rule requires anyone asking for special damages to prove strictly that he did suffer such special damages as he claimed. This however does not mean that the law requires a minimum measure of evidence or that the law lays down a special category of evidence required to establish entitlement to special damages. What is required is that the person claiming should establish his entitlement to that type of damages by creditable evidence of such a character as would suggest that he indeed is entitled to an award under that head, otherwise the general law of evidence as to proof by preponderance or weight usual in civil cases operates.” Per COKER, JSC

 


CASES CITED


Onasanya v. Adeniji (1952) 14 WACA. 81|Agbaje v. National Motors, S.C. 20/68 of 13th March, 1970|Rookes v. Barndard (1964) 2 WLR. 269

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Local Government Law Cap. 68 (Laws of Western Nigeria, 1959)|

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.