OJO SAMUEL OLUSHOLA VS W. J FALAIYE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OJO SAMUEL OLUSHOLA VS W. J FALAIYE

ODUNSI LASISI AJIBOLA VS AMINU AKINDELE AJANI OJORA
September 8, 2025
OLAWOYIN J. S. VS ATTORNEY GENERAL, NORTHERN REGION
September 8, 2025
ODUNSI LASISI AJIBOLA VS AMINU AKINDELE AJANI OJORA
September 8, 2025
OLAWOYIN J. S. VS ATTORNEY GENERAL, NORTHERN REGION
September 8, 2025
Show all

OJO SAMUEL OLUSHOLA VS W. J FALAIYE

Legalpedia Citation: (1961-06) Legalpedia 20299 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Thu Jun 8, 1961

Suit Number: SC. 104/1961

CORAM


BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

UNSWORTH , JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


W. J. FALAIYE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

ELECTION PETITION – EVIDENCE -CROSS- EXAMINATION-DISCRETION- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC  41

The appellant sought to void the respondent’s election on grounds of non- compliance with electoral rules. During cross-examination, the respondent gave evidence that he was a member of a government board. The appellant then applied to the court to inquire into the issue of the respondent’s membership of a board which is a ground for disqualification.

 

 


HELD


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The court held that the lower court rightly exercise its discretion in refusing the application.

 

 


ISSUES


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Whether the appellant’s application for the trial court to inquire into the issue of the respondent’s membership of a government board, which is a ground for disqualification for an election, ought to have been granted.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION 1960 FSC 207/1959 [1960] NSCC 41


CROSS- EXAMINATION

‘It would be quite contrary to accepted practice to allow a petitioner who had closed his case to use answers elicited in cross-examination of the respondent as an excuse for calling additional evidence in support of an entirely fresh case or in rebuttal of evidence bearing on a matter which was never in issue.’ Per Brett F.J

 


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The Federal Legislative Houses (Disputed Seats) Regulations, 1959

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.