ODUNSI LASISI AJIBOLA VS AMINU AKINDELE AJANI OJORA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ODUNSI LASISI AJIBOLA VS AMINU AKINDELE AJANI OJORA

GIWA VS BISIRIYU O ERINMILOKUN
September 8, 2025
OJO SAMUEL OLUSHOLA VS W. J FALAIYE
September 8, 2025
GIWA VS BISIRIYU O ERINMILOKUN
September 8, 2025
OJO SAMUEL OLUSHOLA VS W. J FALAIYE
September 8, 2025
Show all

ODUNSI LASISI AJIBOLA VS AMINU AKINDELE AJANI OJORA

Legalpedia Citation: (1961-06) Legalpedia 22360 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Thu Jun 8, 1961

Suit Number: S.C. 115/1959

CORAM


BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


AMINU AKINDELE AJANI OJORA , OKE ESUROMBI ARO AND AKINWUNMI ESUROMBI ARO

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

CHIEFTAINCY LAW – EVIDENCE-LAND LAW

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Parties agreed that the appellant has been appointed a white cap chief which usually go with the rights to deal with the family land but the respondent stated that the right was not given to the appellant because the majority of the family did not support his appointment.

 


HELD


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

The court held that the respondents did not prove that the appellant as a white cap chief had no rights which ordinarily go with the title and that the appellant was entitled to the declaration sought.

 


ISSUES


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Whether the appellant has the usual powers of the Chief or family head.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION 1960 FSC 207/1959 [1960] NSCC 41


BURDEN OF PROOF

‘The burden of proving that there may be simultaneously in one family a Chief who has been capped but has no rights of management over the family property, and another Chief with the same title who has not been capped but manages the family property, was on those who asserted it.’ Per Brett F.J.

 


CASES CITED


ALASAN BABATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41

Akodu v. Omodiji (1927) 8 N.L.R. 55,

Aiyedun v. Oresanya (1938) 14 N.L.R. 116

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.