MOSHESHE GENERAL MERCHANT LTD VS NIGERIA STEEL PRODUCTIONS LTD - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MOSHESHE GENERAL MERCHANT LTD VS NIGERIA STEEL PRODUCTIONS LTD

IBIYEMI ODUYE V NIGERIA AIRWAYS LIMITED
July 21, 2025
WAHAB MABERI V CHIEF OYENIYI ALADE
July 21, 2025
IBIYEMI ODUYE V NIGERIA AIRWAYS LIMITED
July 21, 2025
WAHAB MABERI V CHIEF OYENIYI ALADE
July 21, 2025
Show all

MOSHESHE GENERAL MERCHANT LTD VS NIGERIA STEEL PRODUCTIONS LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (1987) Legalpedia (SC) 81197

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 10, 1987

Suit Number: SC. 152/1984

CORAM


MOHAMMED BELLO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY NNAEMEZIE ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DAHUNSI OLUGBEMI COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


MOSHESHE GENERAL MERCHANT LTD

APPELLANTS 


NIGERIA STEEL PRODUCTION LTD

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Respondent took out a writ against the appellant claiming some sums of money owed and interest. The judgment was then entered in favour of the respondent partly, based on admissions made by the appellant( who did not enter a defence). A later application by the appellant to set aside the judgment was granted, after hearing, the case of the respondent was dismissed which follows an appeal at the appeal court which was allowed, hence this appeal.

 


HELD


Dismissing theappeal (conditionally)

 


ISSUES


None.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


JUDGEMENT WHEN DEFENDANT ADMITS CLAIM


Where, as in the instant appeal, the claim is for a definite sum alleged owed by the defendant, and the defendant admits owing part of this sum, no difficulty will, or should, arise in the court entering judgment for the sum admitted leaving the balance to be contested. In such a case, the judgment could be entered upon an oral application to the court provided that the court, in its own discretion, may, having regard to the circumstances of the case, grant the application and enter judgment there and then, or order the applicant to formally move the Court. Yet, the admission in such a case is a solemn declaration of indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff, in the sum admitted, for the purpose of the remainder of the trial of that action. Per Anialogu JSC

 


CASES CITED


Nwafor Elik v. Elike v. Ihemereme Nwankwoala and Others (1984) 12 S.C. 301

Strauss v. Strauss (1866) L. R. 1 Q.B. 379

Blundell v. Rimmer (1971)1 W.L.R. 123

Fox v. Luke (1925)43 R.P.C. 37

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


High Court (Civil procedure) Rules Cap 65 Vol. 111 Laws of Bendel State of Nigeria, 1976

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUGDMENT

Comments are closed.