MARCUS UKAEGBU VS MARK NWOLOLO - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MARCUS UKAEGBU VS MARK NWOLOLO

DAMULAK DASHI V. STEPHEN DATLONG
May 28, 2025
SAMUEL OSIGWE VS PSPLS MANAGEMENT CONSORTIUM LTD
May 28, 2025
DAMULAK DASHI V. STEPHEN DATLONG
May 28, 2025
SAMUEL OSIGWE VS PSPLS MANAGEMENT CONSORTIUM LTD
May 28, 2025
Show all

MARCUS UKAEGBU VS MARK NWOLOLO

Legalpedia Citation: (2009-01) Legalpedia 97303 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Abuja

Fri Jan 23, 2009

Suit Number: SC 126/2002

CORAM


D MUSDAPHER, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

G A OGUNTADE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

I F OGBUAGU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

P O ADEREMI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

S MUNTAKA-COMMASSIES, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. MARCUS UKAEGBU

2. UKAEGBU NWADIKE

3. GEORNERIUS ELESHl UKAEGBU

4. JOHN UKAEGBU

APPELLANTS 


MARK NWOLOLO(for himself and on behalf of the Egbereuri Family of Umuezike-Umunagbo, Ihitte Mbaise)

 

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


DECLARATION OF TITLE -VISIT TO LOCUS IN QUO – RETRIAL – EVIDENCE

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent as plaintiff claimed damages for trespass, injunction, and declaration of title. Both parties relied on traditional history of inheritance and acts of possession. The trial judge dismissed the respondent’s case. The Court of Appeal on appellant’s appeal ordered a retrial before another judge and to visit the locus in quo. The appellant has further appealed.

 

 


HELD


Appeal allowed

 

 


ISSUES


NONE

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PLEADING SHOULD AVER FACTS SHOWING FOUNDING OF THE LAND IN DISPUTE


Where title is derived by either grant, sale, conquest or inheritance, etc., the pleading, should aver facts relating to the founding of the land in dispute, the person or persons who founded the land and exercised original acts of possession. Per OGBUAGU, JSC

 

 


THERE CANNOT BE TWO CONCURRENT POSSESSION


There cannot be concurrent possession by two persons claiming adversely to each other. Per OGBUAGU, JSC

 

 


WHEN THE PLAINTIFF FAILS TO PROVE HIS CASE


Where in a trial of an action, evidence has been adduced by both parties and the plaintiff fails to prove his case, the proper order is that of dismissal. Per OGBUAGU, JSC

 

 


WEIGHT TO BE ATTACHED TO TRADITIONAL EVIDENCE


The weight to be attached to traditional evidence is a matter which is left to the experience and wisdom of the learned trial Judge/Court. Per OGBUAGU, JSC

 

 


CASES CITED


1. Piaro v. Chief Tenalo & ors. (1976) 12 S.C. 31

2. Ayoola v. Odofin (1984) 2 S.C. 120:

3. Ndukwe v. Acha (1985) 5 S.C 28

4. Dodo Dabo v. Alhaji Abdullahi (2005) 2 SCNJ. 76

5. Okokon Inua v. Eke E.N. Bassey Asuquo (1961) ANLR 576

6. Amakor v. Obiefuna (1974) 1 All NLR (Pt.l) 119

7. Ogundare & ors. v. Okanlawon & Ors. (1963) 1 ANLR 358

8. Alhaji Elias v. Chief Omo-Bare (1982) 1 ANLR (Pt.l) 70

9. Umar v. Bayero University (1988) 4 NWLR (Pt.86) 85

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. Evidence Act

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.