MADAM EUNICE ENABULELE VS MADAM OMOYEVBESE AGBONLAHOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

MADAM EUNICE ENABULELE VS MADAM OMOYEVBESE AGBONLAHOR

MADUBUONWU V NNALUE
June 27, 2025
BERNARD DAN-JUMBO VS DR STEPHEN DAN- JUMBO & ORS
June 27, 2025
MADUBUONWU V NNALUE
June 27, 2025
BERNARD DAN-JUMBO VS DR STEPHEN DAN- JUMBO & ORS
June 27, 2025
Show all

MADAM EUNICE ENABULELE VS MADAM OMOYEVBESE AGBONLAHOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1999-09) Legalpedia 70982 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Sun Sep 12, 1999

Suit Number: SC 122/1993

CORAM


A.B. WALI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

I.L. KUTIGI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

U. MOHAMMED, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

S.U. ONU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

A.I. IGUH, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


MADAM EUNICE ENABULELE

APPELLANTS 


MADAM OMOYEVBESE AGBONLAHOR

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAND LAW-DECLARATION-DAMAGES-TRESPASS-INJUNCTION

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent brought an action for trespass to land and a declaration that she is the one entitled to a statutory right of occupancy of the piece of land against the appellant

 

 


HELD


The Court held that although as a general rule priority under Bini Native Law and Customary depend on date of Oba’s approval but in the instant ease the respondent showed a better title and so was rightly given priority by the learned trial Judge and accordingly dismissed the appeal.

 

 


ISSUES


1. Whether having regard to Exhibits A and G the Respondent has established a prior title under Benin customary law as to defeat the interest of the Appellant and her predecessors in title on the land in dispute.

2. Whether taking cognisance of the whole evidence before the court the Plaintiff/Respondent has proved her claim under Benin Customary Law as to entitle her to the declaration and injunction sought.

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ON ATTITUDE OF APPELLATE COURT TO CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF THE TWO LOWER COURTS


‘…it is the settled policy and attitude of this court not to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact of lower courts unless such findings occasion miscarriage of justice and/or are violations of principles of law and practice which are alleged and substantiated by the appellants…’ Onu, JSC

 

 


CASES CITED


Aigbe v. Edokpolo (1977) 2 SC. 1 at 3;

Arase v. Arase (1981) 5 SC. 33;

Okeava v. Agaebor (1970) 1 All NLR 1 at 8-10 (Reprint);

Atiti Gold v. Osaseren (1970) 1 All NLR 132; (1971) UILR. 131;

Akhionbare v. Ontoregie (1976) 12 SC. 11 at 28;

Bello v. Eweka (1981) 1 SC. 101

Awoyegbe v. Ogbeide (1988) 1 NWLR (Part 73) 695.

Bello v. Eweka (1981) 1 SC. 101 at 129

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act Cap. 112 Laws of the Federation, 1990

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.