LEEDO PRESIDENTIAL MOTEL LTD. VS BANK OF THE NORTH LIMITED AND ANOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

LEEDO PRESIDENTIAL MOTEL LTD. VS BANK OF THE NORTH LIMITED AND ANOR

BALLA UMARU & ANOR VS ABDUL MUTALLABI & ORS
June 27, 2025
VICTOR OSITA OKONKWO VS GEORGE N.C. OKONKWO & ORS
June 27, 2025
BALLA UMARU & ANOR VS ABDUL MUTALLABI & ORS
June 27, 2025
VICTOR OSITA OKONKWO VS GEORGE N.C. OKONKWO & ORS
June 27, 2025
Show all

LEEDO PRESIDENTIAL MOTEL LTD. VS BANK OF THE NORTH LIMITED AND ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1998) Legalpedia (SC) 11211

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 17, 1998

Suit Number: SC 41/1992

CORAM


IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMAD, JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL

MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS

KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SYLVESTER U. ONU,JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY I. IGUH,JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


LEEDO PRESIDENTIAL MOTEL LTD. APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was a customer of the 1st respondent bank and was owed the bank some amount. The bank sued the appellant in the High Court of Kano State claiming the amount owed it by the appellant.


HELD


The Court held that the order made by the Kano State High Court on 6/6/88 granting leave to the 1st respondent to attach and sell the appellant’s immovable property was null and void. It also declared the attachment and sale of the appellant’s property null and void. The purported order for possession made on 4/2/91 in favour of the 2nd respondent was equally declared a nullity.


ISSUES


1. Whether there was proof before the court that movable properties of the appellant had been attached before proceedings against its immovable property.2. Whether or not there were material irregularities in the conduct of the sale of the immovable property of the appellant which should have vitiated the sale but which were not considered by the Court of Appeal.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


LEAVE TO ATTACH IMMOVABLE PROPERTY


“leave to attach immovable property is not granted as a matter of course.” Ogundare, JSC. quoted with approval Idigbe CJ (As he then was ) in Osunkiro v. Ugbogbo (1966) NMLR 184


PROCEDURE FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY


“I think in a situation where immovable property of a judgment debtor is to be attached, the judgment debtor is entitled to be put on notice. In other words, the motion shall be one on notice to the judgment debtor as against ex parte motion..” Ogundare, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Mutual Aid Society Ltd. v. Ogonade (1975) NMLR 1182. Osunkwo v. Ugbogbo (1966) NMLR 1843. Koya v. Koloya Zawan (1958) NRNLR 14. Bayero v. Federal Mortgage Bank Nig. Ltd. & Anor. (1998) 2 NWLR (Pt.538) 509.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.