JOSIAH CORNELIUS LIMITED V EZENWA - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

JOSIAH CORNELIUS LIMITED V EZENWA

FREDERICK OLUYOLE BAMGBOYE VS ABEKE OLUSOGA
July 4, 2025
MIDFORD EDOSOMWAN VS KENNETH OGBEYFUN
July 4, 2025
FREDERICK OLUYOLE BAMGBOYE VS ABEKE OLUSOGA
July 4, 2025
MIDFORD EDOSOMWAN VS KENNETH OGBEYFUN
July 4, 2025
Show all

JOSIAH CORNELIUS LIMITED V EZENWA

Legalpedia Citation: (1996) Legalpedia (SC) 11507

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Tue Apr 16, 1996

Suit Number: SC.102/1994

CORAM


MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS, CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, (Presided), JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UWANI MUSA ABBA AJI


PARTIES


1. JOSIAH CORNELIUS LIMITED 2. MASTER MALLEABLE FITTING FOUNDRIES NIGERIA LIMITED3. THE WHEEL BARROWS HAND TRUCKS AND CARTS MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.4. THE ROADMASTER INDUSTRIES (NIGERIA) LIMITED APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The trial court, on application of the appellant, ordered instalmental payment of the value of the respondent’s share in the companies in dispute. The respondent only complained after collecting the first instalment.   ?


HELD


The court held that the trial court had exercised its discretion judicially and judiciously in ordering installmental payment.   ?


ISSUES


1. Whether the court below was right in holding that the reasons given by the trial court for arriving at the orders which it made were in law irrelevant and untenable and therefore insufficient to sustain the orders which it made.2. Whether the court below was not in error in law to have interfered with the trial court’s exercise of its discretion in ordering an instalmental payment by the majority shareholder of the total value of the shares of the minority shareholder.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHEN AN APPELLATE COURT WILL INTERFERE WITH EXERCISE OF DISCRETION BY A COURT


An appellate court will not, in principle, interfere with the exercise of discretion by the trial court unless that discretion is shown to have been exercised upon wrong principle or that the exercise was tinted by some illegality or substantial irregularity – Kalgo J.S.C


CASES CITED


Anyah v. A.N.N. Ltd. (1992) 6 NWLR (Pt 247) 319; University of Lagos v. Aigoro (1995) 1 NWLR (Pt. 1) 143; Niger Construction Ltd. v. Okugbeni (1987) 4 NWLR (Pt. 67) 787;7-up Bottling Company Ltd. v. Abiola & Sons Ltd. (1995) 3 NWLR (Pt. 381) 257 at 285; University of Lagos v. Olaniyan (1985) 1 NWLR (Pt. 1) 156 Okafor v. Bendel Newspapers Corporation (1991) 7 NWLR (Pt. 206) 651.?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.