HOLMAN (BROS) LIMITED V KIGO (NIG.) LIMITEDD, GOODWIN BARSBY LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

HOLMAN (BROS) LIMITED V KIGO (NIG.) LIMITEDD, GOODWIN BARSBY LIMITED

ALHAJI A.G. ISHOLA-NOAH V HIS EXCELLENCY, THE BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER TO NIGERIA
July 30, 2025
MRS VICTORIA OMOLARA BUCKNOR-MACLEAN VS INLAKS LIMITED
July 30, 2025
ALHAJI A.G. ISHOLA-NOAH V HIS EXCELLENCY, THE BRITISH HIGH COMMISSIONER TO NIGERIA
July 30, 2025
MRS VICTORIA OMOLARA BUCKNOR-MACLEAN VS INLAKS LIMITED
July 30, 2025
Show all

HOLMAN (BROS) LIMITED V KIGO (NIG.) LIMITEDD, GOODWIN BARSBY LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (1980) Legalpedia (SC) 11110

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Sep 5, 1980

Suit Number: SC. 27/1980

CORAM


SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR

ANIAGOLU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KAYODE ESO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MOHAMMED BELLO, CHIEF JUSTICE OF NIGERIA


PARTIES


HOLMAN (BROS) LIMITED APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Defendant/Applicant brought an application before the Supreme Court for stay of further proceedings of the substantive action in the Kano High Court, after same application was refused by the High court and the Federal Court of Appeal.


HELD


The court granted the prayer of the applicant, further proceedings in the action now pending before the Kano High Court be stayed.


ISSUES


Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to grant a stay of further proceedings in the High Court pending the determination of an appeal against the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal filed herein.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


STAY OF PROCEEDINGS


The court from which an appeal lies as well as the court to which an appeal lies have a duty to preserve the res for the purpose of ensuring that the appeal, if successful, is not nugatory PER ESO, JSC


CASES CITED


Shodeinde and Ors. v. Ahmadiyya Movement-In-Islam (1980) 1/2 S.C. 163

Ogunremi v. Dada (1962), 1 All NLR 663

Vaswani Trading Co. v. Savalakh & Co. (1972) All NLR Pt.2 483

Wilson v. Church (No. 1) (1879) 11 Ch.D 576

Re Erinford Properties (1974) Ch. 261

Andler & Ors. v. Duke & Ors. (1932) 3 Dom.L.R. 210


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Supreme Court Act No.12 of 1960

The Supreme Court Rules 1977

The Federal Court of Appeal Decree, 1976.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.