HIRAT ADERINSOLA BALOGUN V. THE NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

HIRAT ADERINSOLA BALOGUN V. THE NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD

ABDUL HAMID OJO V. PRIMATE E.O. ADEJOBI & ORS
August 4, 2025
SAMUEL FADIORA & ANOR V. FESTUS GBADEBO & ANOR
August 4, 2025
ABDUL HAMID OJO V. PRIMATE E.O. ADEJOBI & ORS
August 4, 2025
SAMUEL FADIORA & ANOR V. FESTUS GBADEBO & ANOR
August 4, 2025
Show all

HIRAT ADERINSOLA BALOGUN V. THE NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-03) Legalpedia (SC) 76111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Mar 9, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 244/1976

CORAM


DARNLEY A.R. ALEXANDER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MOHAMMED BELLO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR


PARTIES


HIRAT ADERINSOLA BALOGUN

APPELLANTS 


THE NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


BANKING – DISHONOUR OF CHEQUES- DAMAGES

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant, a solicitor, issued a cheque in respect of her clients account which was unjustifiably dishonoured by the respondent. The trial court awarded her the sum of N10 as damages on the ground that she did not plead and prove actual damages

 


HELD


The court allowed the appeal and held that there was no need for the appellant to plead and prove actual damage in order to be entitled to substantial damage.

 


ISSUES


Whether the Appellant is entitled to substantial damages for dishonour of her cheque by the Respondents without any allegation, in her pleadings, of special or actual damage flowing from such dishonour of the cheque and proof of the same

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHETHER A PERSON ENGAGED IN BUSINESS NEED TO PROVE ACTUAL DAMAGE TO BE ENTITLED TO SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL DISHONOR OF CHEQUE


people engaged in business need recover substantial damages without proof of actual loss because of the damage deemed to be necessarily done to their credit, and/or reputation in business, by the unjustified action of the bankers; per se the act could imply, unjustifiably, insolvency or dishonesty on the part of the person engaged in business – Idigbe J.S.C

 


LIABILITY OF A BANK FOR WRONGFUL DISHONOUR OF CHEQUES


Refusal by a banker to pay a customers cheque when he holds in hand an amount, equivalent to that endorsed on the cheque, belonging to the customer amounts to a breach of contract for which the banker is liable in damages- Idigbe J.S.C

 


CASES CITED


Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Corporation (1921) 3 KB 110 at 127

Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch. 341

Pyke v. Hiberman Bank (1905) IR 195;

Milward v. Lloyds Bank – unreported 1924

Marzetti v. Williams (1830) 1 B & Ad 415

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.