GILBERT T. SAGAY V EGBERUO IKPIRI SAJERE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

GILBERT T. SAGAY V EGBERUO IKPIRI SAJERE

EMMANUEL AGBANELO VS UNION BANK OF NIGERIA LTD.
June 26, 2025
SUNDAY IHUEBEKA VS THE STATE
June 26, 2025
EMMANUEL AGBANELO VS UNION BANK OF NIGERIA LTD.
June 26, 2025
SUNDAY IHUEBEKA VS THE STATE
June 26, 2025
Show all

GILBERT T. SAGAY V EGBERUO IKPIRI SAJERE

Legalpedia Citation: (2000) Legalpedia (SC) 62411

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 14, 2000

Suit Number: SC.80/1994

CORAM


ADOLPHUS G. KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDRIS L. KUTIGI , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

THMAN MOHAMMED , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ALOYSIUS I. KATSINA-ALU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MICHAEL E. OGUNDARE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


GILBERT T. ESANJUMI SAGAY substituted for Andrew Agbaminebitse Sagay, (DCD), (for himself and on behalf of the children of late Joseph Esanjumi Sagay) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant, (the plaintiff) on behalf of himself and the children of Joseph Esanjumi Sagay, (Joseph Sagay) sued the three respondents (the defendants) for themselves and on behalf of the Amukpe Community claiming damages for trespass and perpetual injunction.


HELD


That the Court of Appeal were right in holding that the proper order to make was to remit the case to the High court for retrial before another judge of that court


ISSUES


Whether the Court of Appeal were justified in ordering the case to be reheard


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROPER EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE


When there are materials before the judge upon which he has to assess the evidence of a witness, it is not enough for the judge to say that he believed that witness without proper evaluation of the evidence upon which he based his belief-Per Emmanuel O. Ayoola, JSC


DUTY OF TRIAL COURT IN ASSESSING EVIDENCE


The appraisal of oral evidence and the ascription of probative values to evidence is the primary function of the trial court. Where the issue turns on the credibility of witnesses an appellate court which has not seen the witnesses must defer to the opinion of the trial court. Where the trial court has made an imperfect or improper use of the opportunities of seeing the witnesses, the appellate court will not seek to ascribe credibility to the witnesses but would order a retrial. Per Emmanuel O. Ayoola, JSC


CASES CITED


1. Gbadamosi v. Ajao SC. 462/662. Ozibe & Ors. v. Aigbe & Ors. (1977) 11 N.S.C.C. 3893. Fashanu v. Adekoya (1974) 6 SC 83?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.