ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS
September 10, 2025
RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR
September 11, 2025
COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS
September 10, 2025
RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR
September 11, 2025
Show all

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Sep 11, 2025

Suit Number: SC. 2/1986

CORAM


KAYODE ESO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MOHAMMED BELLO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

E. O. AYOOLA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, CHIEF JUSTICE NIGERIA

SAIDU KAWU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ADOLPHUS G. KARIBI-WHYT, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OPUTA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA

APPELLANTS 


THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

Plaintiff instituted a suit in the High Court of Kaduna State against the defendant for a declaration that the purported revocation of the plaintiffs right of occupancy No. N.C. 14438 over a piece of land is null and void. After the claim was dismissed, an appeal at the Court of appeal was struck out for want of complete records of appeal, hence this present appeal.


HELD


Allowing the appeal, case remitted to the High Court for hearing de novo.


ISSUES


None.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


NOTABLE PRONOUNCEMENT


In the exercise of its judicial powers a court of law should adhere to constitutionality. It should not condone the commission by a State of a constitutional wrong nor should it be an accessory after the fact to the commission of unconstitutionality. Per Bello CJN


DUTY OF APPELLANT IN FORWARDING RECORDS OF APPEAL


Once an appellant has deposited the money for making up and forwarding the record, he had performed his duty. Per Bello CJN


PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY OF JUDGEMENT


A judgment of a court of law is presumed to be valid until it is proved by person challenging its validity to be wrong. And this court approaches an appeal on the principle that the appellant must show that the decision was wrong. Per Bello CJN


PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY OF JUDGEMENT


A judgment of a court of law is presumed to be valid until it is proved by person challenging its validity to be wrong. And this court approaches an appeal on the principle that the appellant must show that the decision was wrong. Per Bello CJN

 


CASES CITED


Oblamalu v. Nwosu

Uwechia v. Obi

Ajala v. Nigeria General Motors Ltd. FCA/L/58/81, delivered on 1st December, 1981

Odiase v. Agho (1972) 1 All N.L.R. (Part 1) 170 at 176

Agbonmagbe Bank v. C.F.A.O. (1966) 1 All N.L.R. 140 at 143.

Bello v. Attorney-General of Oyo State (1965) 5 N.W.L.R. 828


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Rules of the Supreme Court 1965

Supreme Court Practice 1979 Vol. 1

Court of Appeal Rules 1981

Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1979


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.