CITY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LTD V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL, LAGOS STATE. - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CITY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LTD V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL, LAGOS STATE.

ANICHE NZONWANNE & ORS V. CHRISTOPHER IGWE & ORS
August 8, 2025
BORNU HOLDING & CO. LTD V. ADAMA DIPCHARIMA
August 8, 2025
ANICHE NZONWANNE & ORS V. CHRISTOPHER IGWE & ORS
August 8, 2025
BORNU HOLDING & CO. LTD V. ADAMA DIPCHARIMA
August 8, 2025
Show all

CITY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LTD V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL, LAGOS STATE.

Legalpedia Citation: (1976) Legalpedia (SC) 51110

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jan 30, 1976

Suit Number: SC. 29/1975

CORAM


ALEXANDER, CHIEF JUSTICE OF NIGERIA

MARYAM ALOMA MUKHTAR JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CITY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LTD APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants alleged that the vast parcel of land purportedly acquired by the government included part of its land. It alleged that the acquisition was invalid as it did not follow the due process of law vis-à-vis service of notice of acquisition.


HELD


It was held that the claim of the appellant must fail as the land it purported to acquire was invalid as same was conveyed to it by Chief Oniru as beneficial owner. It was also held that the land cannot vest in the government until the government has applied for certificate in respect of the lands.


ISSUES


Whether or not the appellant is entitled to the acres of land in dispute

Whether or not mere notice of publication of acquisition vest land in government


RATIONES DECIDENDI


EFFECT OF PUBLIC NOTICE OF ACQUISITION


We think we ought to make it clear that, in the absence of any particular statutory provision to the contrary, the issuing of the public notice of acquisition does not immediately vest the title to the land in the Government, but that the latter may acquire it only after satisfying the provisions of the Public Lands Acquisition Act requiring that a Land Certificate should be obtained as proof of title… FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC


CONVEYANCE BY HEAD OF FAMILY AS BENEFICIAL OWNER


The law on this point is well settled. Chief Yesufu Abiodun Oniru, as the head of the Oniru Chieftaincy family, cannot alone transfer family property. If he alone executes a conveyance of family property as a grantor, the sale is prima facie voidable and the family can set aside such a sale if the other members act timeously. This is the case only where the head of the family signs the conveyance for and on behalf of the family. It does not apply where, as in the case in hand, he purports to sell the property as the beneficial owner… FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC


CASES CITED


Atunrase & Ors. v. Federal Commissioner for Works & Housing (1975) 6 S.C. p.1

Akerele v. Atunrase (1969) 1 All NLR 201

Ekpendu v. Erika (1959) 4 FSC, p.79 at page 81

Lawal v. G.B. Ollivant (Nig.) Ltd. (1972) 1 All NLR Part 1 at page 207,


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Public Lands Acquisition Law (Cap.105)


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.