CHIEF SALAMI OLATUNDE V. SALAMI AFOLABI ABIDOGUN - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF SALAMI OLATUNDE V. SALAMI AFOLABI ABIDOGUN

EJUETAMI V OLAIYA
June 20, 2025
ABAYOMI OLALEKAN V. THE STATE
June 20, 2025
EJUETAMI V OLAIYA
June 20, 2025
ABAYOMI OLALEKAN V. THE STATE
June 20, 2025
Show all

CHIEF SALAMI OLATUNDE V. SALAMI AFOLABI ABIDOGUN

Legalpedia Citation: (2001) Legalpedia (SC) 11415

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 14, 2001

Suit Number: SC.170/1996

CORAM


UMARU ATU KALGO , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, , JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.


PARTIES


1. CHIEF SALAMI OLATUNDE(The Aare Alasa of Ogbomoso2. ADEGBOYEGA ADEFOWOPE(For Himself and Other Members of Jagun Alugbin of Ogbomoso). APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondents sued the appellant at the High court seeking inter alia a declaration that there was only one chieftaincy stool in the village and he was entitled to be sworn in as the holder of same. He was granted his prayer and an injunction was granted restraining the respondent from parading himself as the substantive occupier. The appellant appealed and lost. He has again appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


APPEAL DISMISSED


ISSUES


1. Whether the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the origin or root of the Chieftaincy of Jagun Alasa was not seriously in issue at the trial and that the resolution of the issue was essentially immaterial.2. Where the principle enunciated by the Privy Council in kojo II v. Bonsie is applicable, would a judge of trial or indeed a Court of Appeal be duty bound to resolve traditional evidence he had declared conflicting and inconclusive?3. Whether the Court of Appeal was right to have confirmed the judgment of the trial court with the errors.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACTS OF LOWER COURTS WILL NOT BE SET ASIDE EXCEPT WHERE IT PERVERESE


“an Appellant who seeks to challenge the concurrent findings of fact of the High Court and the Court of Appeal has to advance cogent reasons why this Court should accede to this challenge”. {Per Ejiwummi JSC}


CASES CITED


1. Kojo II v. Bonsie (1957) 1.W.L.R. 12232. Folorunsho v. Adeyemi (1975) N.M.L.R. 128 CAW.3.  A.M. Akinloye v. Bello Eyiyola and Others (1968) N.M.L.R. 92.4.  Balogun v. Agboola (1974)10 SC 111.5. Victor Woluchem and Ors v. Chief Gudi and Ors (1981) 5 S.C. 291.6.  lbanga v. Usanga (1982) 5. S.C. 103.7. Kuforiji v. V.Y.B. M.(1981) 6-7 S,C.40.8.  Awoyale v. Ogunbiyi (1986) 2 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 24) 626.9.  Olaloye v, Balogun (1990) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 148) 24 at 38.10. U.B.A. Ltd. v. Achoru (1990) 6 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 156) 254.11.  Motunwase v. Sorungbe (1988) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 92)90.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.