CHIEF REECE EDUKUGHO VS JEMIDE AWANI - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF REECE EDUKUGHO VS JEMIDE AWANI

DURU VS INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
September 3, 2025
CHUKWU OBAJI VS THE STATE
September 3, 2025
DURU VS INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
September 3, 2025
CHUKWU OBAJI VS THE STATE
September 3, 2025
Show all

CHIEF REECE EDUKUGHO VS JEMIDE AWANI

Legalpedia Citation: (1965-08) Legalpedia 38845 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Thu Aug 12, 1965

Suit Number: SC 273/1965

CORAM


ADEMOLA CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF REECE EDUKUGHO

APPELLANTS 


JEMIDE AWANI

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


ELECTION PETITION

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The  respondent, was the petitioner in the High Court of the Mid-West Region at which the appellant was declared not duly elected and the election was nullified, thereby leading to this appeal. 

 


HELD


Allowing the appeal 

 


ISSUES


(1) On the election day Monday 3rd February, 1964 at Saba polling station in the Warri South-West Constituency, voting was suspended for several hours and very many registered voters who had come in the interval to cast their votes could not therefore do so and they had to return to their distant and scattered homes in the creeks; furthermore, that time for voting was not extended at this station to make up for the loss of time.

(2) On the election day, Monday 3rd February, 1964, at Saba polling station, during voting hours, the Presiding Officer, James Atotuoma Atsigbede was found inside the polling booth near the ballot box bearing the symbol of 1st respondent with 50 stamped ballot papers already detached from two booklets.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


IRREGULARITY THAT WILL UPSET AN ELECTION


It is clear that irregularities to upset an election must be substantial and not mere informalities. Per Ademola CJN

 


CHARACTERISTICS OF A TRUE ELECTION


An election which is conducted in such a way, and which whether by accident or by design, does not afford to a very large mass of the electors an opportunity of voting, cannot be a true election of members. Per Ademola CJN

 


CASES CITED


Borough of Hackney Case (1874) 31 L.T. 69. 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Parliamentary Electoral Regulations 1960 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.