CHIEF JACOB IBANGA AND ORS V CHIEF EDET USANGA AND ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF JACOB IBANGA AND ORS V CHIEF EDET USANGA AND ORS

MUSA V. HAMZA & 6 ORS
July 25, 2025
EMMANUEL TAIWO AYENI & ORS V WILLIAM ABIODUN SOWEMIMO
July 25, 2025
MUSA V. HAMZA & 6 ORS
July 25, 2025
EMMANUEL TAIWO AYENI & ORS V WILLIAM ABIODUN SOWEMIMO
July 25, 2025
Show all

CHIEF JACOB IBANGA AND ORS V CHIEF EDET USANGA AND ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1982) Legalpedia (SC) 81117

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 21, 1982

Suit Number: SC. 62/1981

CORAM


IRIKEFE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

IDIGBE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

NNAMANI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF JACOB IBANGA AND ORS APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

After the Biafran war, the plaintiffs’ claims against the defendants damages for trespass and entered upon that piece or parcel of the plaintiffs’ land known as Ebere-Otu Nsai Land (Alias Ebeto Nsai Land) which is a portion of Afaha Nsai Land situate in the Itu District of Uyo Province January, since January 1964


HELD


The Court held that this appeal succeeds and it is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeal in this matter including the order as to costs dated 20th November, 1978, is set aside. The decision of Ete, J., (as he then was), dated 12th March, 1976, is hereby restored in its entirety. The appellants’ pleadings in the court of first instance are hereby amended to include a claim for perpetual injunction as embodied in the judgment dated 12th March, 1976


ISSUES


1. Was the Federal Court of Appeal correct in dealing with the case on the footing that there was no claim for perpetual injunction? 2. Was title to the disputed land in issue at the trial?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PRESUMPTION OF OWNERSHIP


“It is no doubt the law that where possession is doubtful or equivocal the law attached it to title.” Irikefe, JSC.


INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE


“A plaintiff must call evidence to support his pleadings, and evidence which is in fact adduced which is contrary to his pleadings should never be admitted.” Irikefe, JSC.


CASES CITED


1. Odunsi v. Kuforiji & Anor. 19 NLR p.7 2. Canvey Island Commissioners v. Preedy (1922) 1 Chancery p.179 was cited with 3. Ojiako & Ors. v. Ogueze & Ors. (1962) 1 All NLR p. 58. 4. Idahosa v. Oronsaye (1959) 4 FSC 166 at 171 5. Bada v. The Chairman L.E.D.B. S.C. 501/65 of 23rd June, 1967 6. Erinle v. Adelaja S.C. 332/1966 of 6th June, 1969 7. Ferdinand George v. U.B.A. (1972) 8/9 S.C. 264 at 275


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.