CHIEF ALHAJI K. O. S. ARE VS RAJI IPAYE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

CHIEF ALHAJI K. O. S. ARE VS RAJI IPAYE

ALHAJI LATIFU AJUWON VS MADAM ALIMOTU ADEOTI
July 16, 2025
ABIODUN ADELAJA VS OLATUNDE FANOIKI & ANOR.
July 16, 2025
ALHAJI LATIFU AJUWON VS MADAM ALIMOTU ADEOTI
July 16, 2025
ABIODUN ADELAJA VS OLATUNDE FANOIKI & ANOR.
July 16, 2025
Show all

CHIEF ALHAJI K. O. S. ARE VS RAJI IPAYE

Legalpedia Citation: (1990-03) Legalpedia 55273 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Fri Mar 30, 1990

Suit Number: SC 225/1986

CORAM


A. NNAMANI, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

M.L. UWAIS, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

S. KAWU, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

A.G.O. AGBAJE, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

P. NNAEMEKA-AGU, JUSTIE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


CHIEF ALHAJI K. O. S. ARE

APPELLANTS 


RAJI IPAYE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CUSTOMARY TENANCY – EVIDENCE- CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACTS- PROOF OF TITLE TO LAND

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondents were in possession of the land in dispute, exercised various acts of possession including granting part of the land to other people and relatives of the plaintiff without the authority of the plaintiffs. They also only paid Ishakole during festivals as sign of goodwill.

 

 


HELD


The court held that they were not customary tenants of the appellants and that the lower courts rightly gave title to the respondents.

 

 


ISSUES


1. Whether the courts below placed the onus of proof on the wrong person.

2.  Whether the courts below drew the proper inference from the facts proved in evidence

3. Whether the grant to the defendants’ ancestors was absolute (as claimed by the defendants) or limited (as claimed by the plaintiffs

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHEN COURT WILL INTERFERE WITH CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF TWO LOWER COURTS


‘an appellant appealing to this Court against concurrent findings of the two lower courts faces an uphill task for this court can only interfere in those findings if that appellant can show special circumstances’. Per Nnamani J.S.C

 

 


ASCERTAINMENT OF TRUE HISTORY


‘it is only where the conflict arises between the traditional history given by one side and the traditional history given by the other side that the test in Kojo II v. Donsie (supra) is resorted to in the ascertainment of the true history’. Per Nnamani J.S.C

 

 


CASES CITED


Enang v. Adu (1981) 11-12 S.C. 25 at p.42

Lokoyi v. Olojo (1983) 8 S.C. 61 at page 63-73; [1983) 2 SCNLR 127

Ojomu v. Ajao (1983)9 S.C. 22 at 53; [1983] 2 SCNLR 156

Ukpe Ibodo & Ors. v. Iguasi Enorofia and Ors (1980) 5-7 S.C. 42, 55;

Western Steel Works v. Iron & Steel Workers (1987)1 N.W.L.R. (Part 49) 284

Akinsanya v. U.B.A. Ltd. (1986)4 N.W.L. R. (Part 35)273;

Nwadike v. H Ibekwe (1987) 4 N.W.L.R. (Part 67) 718

Kojo V. Ronsie (1957)1 W.L.R. 1223

Mogaji v. Cadbury (Nigeria) Ltd. (1985) 2 N.W.L.R. (Part 7) 393

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.