BELL-GAM GEOFFREY VS BELL-GAM GRACE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

BELL-GAM GEOFFREY VS BELL-GAM GRACE

REV. LIJADU VS MRS FRANKLIN (NEE) LIJADU
September 3, 2025
ANOWELE & G. NWAFOR VS THE STATE
September 3, 2025
REV. LIJADU VS MRS FRANKLIN (NEE) LIJADU
September 3, 2025
ANOWELE & G. NWAFOR VS THE STATE
September 3, 2025
Show all

BELL-GAM GEOFFREY VS BELL-GAM GRACE

Legalpedia Citation: (1965-03) Legalpedia 42790 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Thu Mar 25, 1965

Suit Number: SC 354/1964

CORAM


BAIRAMIAN CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ONYEAMA JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


BELL-GAM GEOFFREY

APPELLANTS 


BELL-GAM GRACE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


EVIDENCE-FAMILY LAW 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

W.J. Palmer J. gave judgment for dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion and of the appellant’s adultery; custody of the two children of the marriage was granted to the respondent and dismissed the appellant’s prayer for divorce in his answer; and a monthly maintenance of £2.10s.0d  for each child until the age of sixteen. Dissatisfied the appellant brought this appeal. 

 


HELD


The trial was set aside and a fresh trial was ordered. 

 


ISSUES



RATIONES DECIDENDI


POWER OF A JUDGE TO CALL A WITNESS


ALASAN BABA judge has no power to call a witness except with the consent of the parties. The situation may arise in which it appears to the judge that a person can throw light on the case under trial but has not been called as a witness by either party because neither party wishes to make him his witness. The judge may call him as a witness with the acquiescence of the parties and ask him the questions on which the judge thinks the witness can help. If his answers are useless on the issue in the case, neither party would be allowed to cross-examine him; but if his evidence is adverse to a party, that party should be given leave to cross-examine him on his answers only. Per Bairamian JSCATUNDE, AJAGUNNA II OLUKARE OF IKARE VS GOVERNOR, WESTERN REGION   1960   FSC 207/1959   [1960] NSCC 41A judge has

 


CASES CITED


Coulson v. Disborough [1894] 2 Q.B., 316, C.A., 

In re Enoch Zaretzky, Bock & Co.’s Arbitration [1910] 1 KB. 327, C.A.

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


High Court Law (E.N.) 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.