B.O. BENSON VS LAWRENCE OTUBOR - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

B.O. BENSON VS LAWRENCE OTUBOR

T.A.A. AWOSANYA VS BOARD OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE
August 9, 2025
C.A. BANJO & ORS VS ETERNAL SACRED ORDER OF CHERUBIM AND SERAPHIM
August 9, 2025
T.A.A. AWOSANYA VS BOARD OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE
August 9, 2025
C.A. BANJO & ORS VS ETERNAL SACRED ORDER OF CHERUBIM AND SERAPHIM
August 9, 2025
Show all

B.O. BENSON VS LAWRENCE OTUBOR

Legalpedia Citation: (1975) Legalpedia (SC) 64161

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Mar 13, 1975

Suit Number: SC. 28/1974

CORAM


TASLIM O. ELIAS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ATANDA FATAI-WILLIAMS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SIR UDO UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


B.O. BENSON APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court in which the plaintiff was awarded the sum of £750 as general and special damages suffered by the plaintiff in a motor accident resulting in damage to his car as a result of the negligent driving of Francis Anizor the defendants driver in the course of his employment and in the management of the defendants vehicle in which the plaintiffs vehicle was badly damaged and the plaintiff suffered loss thereby.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed.


ISSUES


The trial court erred in law in giving judgment against the defendant when the plaintiff did not prove that the driver of the vehicle at the material time was a servant of the defendant.

The damages awarded were excessive.

The learned trial Judge erred in law in holding an award for both Special and General Damages contrary to the claim before the court.

The learned trial Judge erred in law in holding that negligence was proved when there was no evidence on record to prove the particulars of negligence averred in the Statement of Claim.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF OF NEGLIGENCE ON VICARIOUS LIABILITY


<br< p=””></br<>


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.