ANYAEGBU OJIEGBE & ORS VS GABRIEL OKWARANYIA & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ANYAEGBU OJIEGBE & ORS VS GABRIEL OKWARANYIA & ORS

AYUWE LONGE VS ALICE ADEYEBI AJAKAIYE
September 4, 2025
UMARU GWANDU VS N.A GWANDU
September 4, 2025
AYUWE LONGE VS ALICE ADEYEBI AJAKAIYE
September 4, 2025
UMARU GWANDU VS N.A GWANDU
September 4, 2025
Show all

ANYAEGBU OJIEGBE & ORS VS GABRIEL OKWARANYIA & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2022-02) Legalpedia 31825 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Mon Nov 12, 1962

Suit Number: SC 296/1961

CORAM


BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


GABRIEL OKWARANYIA AND ORS. (for themselves and on behalf of the four families of ABUKWA-UMUOBOM)

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


LAW OF EVIDENCE-WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE—VISIT TO LOCUS IN QUO

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiffs/respondents sued the defendant/appellants claiming for a declaration of title as to the land in dispute, damages for trespass and an injunction restraining them against further trespass.

 

 


HELD


On these grounds I would dismiss the appeal with costs assessed at 20 guineas.

 

 


ISSUES


First it is said that the Judge came to a wrong conclusion in holding that the Abukwa family owned any land to the South of the Okwa stream apart from the por-tion already referred to, and in particular that he made a wrong use of evi-dence given by two witnesses from Okohia in arbitration proceedings con-cerning that portion of land which took place between the respondents and a third family in 1932.

Secondly it is said that even if it is established that the Abukwa owned other land to the South of the stream the southern boundary is not proved with sufficient precision to justify the grant of a declaration of title.

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE


As admissions by persons from whom the parties to the suit have derived their interest in the subject matter of the suit, or under s. 33(c) as statements against proprietary interest made by persons now dead. Per BRETT F.J.

 

 


CASES CITED


R. v. Dogbe, 12 W.A.C.A. 184

Nwizuk v. Eneyok, (1953) 14 W.A.C.A. 354

Buckingham v. Daily News Ltd. (1956) 2 Q.B. 534

 

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Evidence Act

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.