ALHAJI ABBA MOHAMMED SANI VS THE PRESIDENT, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALHAJI ABBA MOHAMMED SANI VS THE PRESIDENT, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION

REGISTERED TRUSTEES IKOYI CLUB 1938 V MR. TIMOTHY IKUJUNI
April 5, 2025
MRS. REBECCA VINCENT ANTHONY V. THE STATE
April 5, 2025
REGISTERED TRUSTEES IKOYI CLUB 1938 V MR. TIMOTHY IKUJUNI
April 5, 2025
MRS. REBECCA VINCENT ANTHONY V. THE STATE
April 5, 2025
Show all

ALHAJI ABBA MOHAMMED SANI VS THE PRESIDENT, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION

Legalpedia Citation: (2019) Legalpedia (SC) 42611

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

HOLDEN AT ABUJA

Wed Feb 6, 2019

Suit Number: SC.68/2010

CORAM



PARTIES


APPELLANTS


THE PRESIDENT FEDERAL REPUBIC OF NIGERIAATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff/Appellant commenced this action at the Federal High Court, Kano Judicial Division by Originating Summons, against the Defendant/Respondents for authorizing the Swiss Authorities to freeze all the bank accounts held in that jurisdiction by late General Sani Abacha, his children, his servants and agents or any other third party who participated in the misappropriation of public funds. The trial Court dismissed the Appellant’s claims; he appealed to the Court of Appeal, Kaduna Division which appeal was also dismissed; hence his appeal to the Supreme Court. The Appellant’s contention bothered on the provisions of section 2(2) of the Public Officers’ Protection Act, which according to him operates subject to certain exceptions, qualifications or limitations embedded therein. That it protects a public officer in respect of any action, prosecution or proceedings and that the Respondent acted outside the colour of his office without a semblance of legal justification. The Respondent’s contention on the other hand, was that the Appellant’s case before the lower courts was caught by the provisions of the Public Officers’ Protection Act, in that it was not filed within three months as contained in the Act, and that the Appellant’s argument about the non -existence of the Banks (Freezing Account) Act was outside the scope of the Public Officers’ Protection Act.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


Whether the Learned Trial Judge was right in refusing the stay of execution when the Appellant is raising the issue of juristic personality of the Respondent as a recondite ground Whether the court below was right in refusing the application for stay Whether a court can entertain the appeal when same is filed out of time.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED


Not Available


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Banks (Freezing of Accounts) Act,1984|Commonwealth (Enactment and Enforcement) Act Cap M 24, Laws of Federation of Nigeria, 2004|Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended)|Public Officers’ Protection Act Cap. P. 41 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004|


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.