ALBERT E. NWOBU & ANOR VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ALBERT E. NWOBU & ANOR VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

LAWAL ADISA YUSUF SHITTA-BEY VS CHAIRMAN, LAGOS EXECUTIVE DEVT. BOARD
September 4, 2025
JIA ENTERPRISES (ELECTRICAL) LIMITED & ANOR VS BRITISH & FRENCH BANK LTD
September 4, 2025
LAWAL ADISA YUSUF SHITTA-BEY VS CHAIRMAN, LAGOS EXECUTIVE DEVT. BOARD
September 4, 2025
JIA ENTERPRISES (ELECTRICAL) LIMITED & ANOR VS BRITISH & FRENCH BANK LTD
September 4, 2025
Show all

ALBERT E. NWOBU & ANOR VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1962-06) Legalpedia 08942 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Fri Jun 22, 1962

Suit Number: SC 382/1961

CORAM


ADEMOLA, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN,JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


APPELLANTS


JAPHET MORDI

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CRIMINAL LAW—SENTENCING—APPEAL

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants, who were employees of the West African Airways Corporation at Kano, were convicted on summary trial by consent, the first of stealing a box of gold worth about £7,000 from an aeroplane in transit, and the second of receiving the box knowing it to have been stolen. The trial magistrate imposed the longest term he could within his jurisdiction-two years on each. On appeal the Judge dismissed the appeal and increased the sentence.

 

 


HELD


The appeals against the order made on 5th August, 1961, by the High Court of the Northern Region in Appeal No. K/43CA/1961 brought by Albert E. Nwobu and Japhet Mordi, who were convicted by the Magistrate Grade 1 in case No. KA/450C/60 on 22nd March, 1961, are disallowed insofar as the appeals relate to the order affirming the conviction, but he appeals are allowed insofar as the order increases the terms of imprisonment for two years on each of the appellants imposed by the Magistrate, and those terms are restored.

 

 


ISSUES


Whether the Judge was empowered to increase the sentence beyond the limit the magistrate could impose?

 

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


LIMITATION OF COURT TO INCREASE SENTENCING:


1.  ‘The power to increase sentence is subject to both limitations-(l) the maximum which the offence carries, and (2) the maximum which the trial magistrate could impose. That seems to have been the view taken over the years during which the provision in section 48 of the High Court Law has been in operation’. Per BAIRAMIAN F. J.

 

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Northern Region High Court Law, 1955

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.