ADONE V. IKEBUDU - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ADONE V. IKEBUDU

PROFESSOR V.O.S. OLUNLOYO V. ADEDAPO ADENIRAN
June 20, 2025
OLANREWAJU V AFRIBANK PLC
June 20, 2025
PROFESSOR V.O.S. OLUNLOYO V. ADEDAPO ADENIRAN
June 20, 2025
OLANREWAJU V AFRIBANK PLC
June 20, 2025
Show all

ADONE V. IKEBUDU

Legalpedia Citation: (2001) Legalpedia (SC) 11111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 13, 2001

Suit Number: SC.140/1996

CORAM


UWANI MUSA ABBA AJI

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-AL, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OKAY ACHIKE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT.


PARTIES


1.OKAFOR ADONE2.JOHN NWUDE(For themselves and on behalf of Members of Ire Village, Enugu-Ukwu). APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

Applicant’s claim against the Respondents a declaration that they are the rightful people for the grant of customary right of occupancy relying on traditional evidence, acts of ownership and earlier 1971 judgment.


HELD


The Supreme Court held that res judicata of whatever specie does not avail the appellant in that failure of Respondents to prove their title in the earlier case does not translate to a finding that the Appellants are the rightful owners. ?


ISSUES


Whether the Court below was right in holding that issue estoppel did not avail the Appellants.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


PROOF OF FACTS


“An issue of fact may be proved by an aggregate of facts. Where the aggregate of facts relied on to establish an issue of fact is insufficient, that issue must be resolved against the party who has to establish the issue” – per E.O Ayoola, JSC


CLASSIFICATION OF RES JUDICATA


“The classification of estoppel under estoppely by judgment is related to the purpose for which the judgment is used. If it is intended to be used to permit another suit founded on the same cause of action as the original suit, the decision in the original action is said to constitute res judicata. If on the other hand, the subsequent proceeding are looked at on a different cause of action…as in the instant case, issue estopped can operate only to prevent certain issues which were decided in the original action from arising for further consideration by the Court EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, JSC


CASES CITED


1. UKAEGBU & ORS V. UGOJI & ORS (1991) 6 NWLR (PT. 196) 127 AT 1682. FADIORA & ANOR V. GBADEBO & ANOR (1978) 3 SC. 2193. YOYE V. OLUBODE & ORS (1978) 3 SC 220, 2224. SOSAN V. ADEMUYIWA (1986) 3 NWLR (PT. 27) 241


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Nine


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.