ABUBAKAR SALE (Alias Sholi) VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

ABUBAKAR SALE (Alias Sholi) VS THE STATE

PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. IBRAHIM T. EL-SUDI & ORS
April 26, 2025
WEMA BANK PLC. & ANOR v. ALARAN FROZEN FOODS AGENCY NIGERIA LIMITED & ANOR
April 26, 2025
PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. IBRAHIM T. EL-SUDI & ORS
April 26, 2025
WEMA BANK PLC. & ANOR v. ALARAN FROZEN FOODS AGENCY NIGERIA LIMITED & ANOR
April 26, 2025
Show all

ABUBAKAR SALE (Alias Sholi) VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2015-12) Legalpedia (SC) 98721

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Dec 11, 2015

Suit Number: SC.56/2013

CORAM


IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMED    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

MUHAMMED SAIFULLAH MUNTAKA-COOMASSIE     JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CLARA BATA OGUNBIYI    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMED    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

MUHAMMED SAIFULLAH MUNTAKA-COOMASSIE     JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CLARA BATA OGUNBIYI    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMED    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

MUHAMMED SAIFULLAH MUNTAKA-COOMASSIE     JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CLARA BATA OGUNBIYI    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT

CLARA BATA OGUNBIYI    JUSTICE,  SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


ABUBAKAR SALE (Alias Sholi) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant was charged together with two other persons at the High Court of Zamfara on a two count charge of conspiracy to rob and armed robbery contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code and Section 1(2) of the Robbery and Firearms (Special Provisions) Act, Cap R11, LFR 2004. The trial Court after considering the trial sentenced the Appellant and one other Accused person to death by hanging. Dissatisfied, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal sitting in Sokoto where the court affirmed the decision of the trial court, hence, a further appeal to the Supreme Court.


HELD


Appeal Allowed


ISSUES


1. Whether it can be safely said that the identity of the appellant as one of the robbers was established beyond reasonable doubt by the evidence of Pw2 as affirmed by the lower court?

2. Whether the lower court was wrong to have affirmed the decision of the trial court that the appellant did not furnish sufficient particulars of his and as such his defence of alibi failed?

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act, 2004

Evidence Act Cap E14.2011Robbery and Firearms (Special Provisions) Act, Cap R 11, LFR 2004

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.