A.R. MOGAJI & ORS V. MADAM RIBIATU ODOFIN & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

A.R. MOGAJI & ORS V. MADAM RIBIATU ODOFIN & ORS

P.O. EWARAMI V. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 4, 2025
ALHAJI RAJI ODUOLA & ORS V. IBADAN CITY COUNCIL & ANOR
August 4, 2025
P.O. EWARAMI V. AFRICAN CONTINENTAL BANK LTD
August 4, 2025
ALHAJI RAJI ODUOLA & ORS V. IBADAN CITY COUNCIL & ANOR
August 4, 2025
Show all

A.R. MOGAJI & ORS V. MADAM RIBIATU ODOFIN & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-04) Legalpedia (SC) 63247

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 28, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 372/1976

CORAM


EMANUEL OBIOMA OGWUEGBU, JSC. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)

OKAY ACHIKE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

OBASEKI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


A.R. MOGAJI & ORS

APPELLANTS 


MADAM RABIATU ODFIN & ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


PROPERTY LAW- CIVIL PROCEDURE- DUTY OF COURT

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff sought a declaration of title a piece of land and an injunction to restrain the defendants and their servants and agents from unlawfully entering the said land.

 


HELD


The Supreme Court held that the learned trial Judge, at the time he found for the plaintiffs/respondents, had not considered the defendants/appellants’ case at all.

 


ISSUES


Whether the learned Judge had already prejudged the issue before he ever considered the case for the defendants/appellants let alone the weight to be attached to it

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


BALANCE OF PROBABILITY – DUTY OF COURT


“In short, before a Judge before whom evidence is adduced by the parties before him in a civil case comes to a decision as to which evidence he believes or accepts and which evidence he rejects, he should first of all put the totality of the testimony adduced by both parties on that imaginary scale; he will put the evidence adduced by the plaintiff on one side of the scale and that of the defendant on the other side and weigh them together. He will then see which is heavier not by the number of witnesses called by each party, but by the quality or the probative value of the testimony of those witnesses. This is what is meant when it is said that a civil case is decided on the balance of probabilities. Therefore, in determining which is heavier, the Judge will naturally have regard to the following:-

(a) whether the evidence is admissible;

(b) whether it is relevant;

(c) whether it is credible;

(d) whether it is conclusive; and

(e) whether it is more probable than that given by the other party.

Finally, after invoking the law, if any, that is applicable to the case, the trial Judge will then come to his final conclusion based on the evidence which he has accepted.” Per FATAYI-WILLIAMS, JSC

 


CASES CITED


Aromire & Ors. v. Awoyemi (1972) 1 All NLR 101

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Not Available

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.