BAYO ADELUMOLA VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

BAYO ADELUMOLA VS THE STATE

JUDE EZEOKE AND ORS VS MOSES NWAGBO AND OTHERS
July 18, 2025
DAYO DUYILE AND ANOR VS KELLY OGUNBAYO AND SONS LIMITED
July 18, 2025
JUDE EZEOKE AND ORS VS MOSES NWAGBO AND OTHERS
July 18, 2025
DAYO DUYILE AND ANOR VS KELLY OGUNBAYO AND SONS LIMITED
July 18, 2025
Show all

BAYO ADELUMOLA VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1988-03) Legalpedia (SC) 13745

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 4, 1988

Suit Number: SC. 133/1986

CORAM


S.O. UWAIFO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ESO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT BAYO ADELUMOLA APPELLANT

NNAMANI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT AND

UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT THE STATE RESPONDENT


PARTIES


BAYO ADELUMOLA

APPELLANTS 


THE STATE

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CRIMINAL LAW – MURDER – SELF DEFENCE

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Appellant Bayo Adelumola was arraigned at the trial court for the murder of one lyabo Olowa. The learned trial Judge found the Appellant guilty as charged. Aggrieved by the appellant he appealed to the Court of Appeal and the lower court equally dismissed the appeal, he further appealed to the Apex Court.

 


HELD


APPEAL DISMISSED

 


ISSUES


Whether or not on the evidence before the Court the accused was acting in Self-Defence.

Should not the Court be wary of convicting upon the evidence of P. W.1 who is shown to entertain grudge against the Accused?”

Is the Statement of the Accused to the Police really at variance with his testimony given in Court? If so, doesn’t the Statement constitute evidence on which the Court cannot act?”

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS-A MAN IS PRESUMED TO INTEND THE NATURAL CONSEQUENCES OF HIS ACTS “


Our law is that a man is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his acts.” PER C.A OPUTA, JSC

 


CRIMINAL LIABILITY-DEFENCE OF ACCIDENT “


“A person is not criminally responsible for an act or omission, which occurs independently of the exercise of his will, or for an event which occurs by accident.” PER C.A OPUTA, JSC

 


CASES CITED


1. Dibie Ajuwa and Ors v. Sebastian Benjamin Odili (1985) 2 NWLR. (Pt. 9) 710

2. Njoku v Eme (1973) 5 SC. 293; (1973) 5 SC. (Reprint) 211

3. Chikwendu v. Mbamali (1980) 3/4 SC. 31; (1980) 3-4 SC. (Reprint) 21

4. Ibodo v. Enarofia (1980) 5 & 7 SC. 42; (1980) 5-7 SC. (Reprint) 29

5. Enang v. Adu (1981) 11-12 SC. 25; (1981)11-12 SC. (Reprint) 62

6. Otogbolu v. OkeIuwa (1981) 6-7 SC. 99; (1981) 6-7 SC.(Reprint)2

7. Overseas Construction Ltd. v. Creek Ent. Ltd (1985) 3 NWLR. (Pt. 13) 407 at 413

8. Ajadi v. Okenihun (1985) 1 NWLR (Pt.3) 484, 489

9. Lokoyi v. Olojo (1983) 2 SC. NLR 127 at 132;(1981) 6-7 SC. (Reprint) 62

10. re Mogaji (1986) 1 NWLR. (Pt. 19) 759 772.

11. Merchantile Investment and General Trust Co. v. River Plate Trust Loan and Agency Co. (1894) 1 CH.D. 578,595

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.