BALLA UMARU & ANOR VS ABDUL MUTALLABI & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

BALLA UMARU & ANOR VS ABDUL MUTALLABI & ORS

KAYODE IDOWU VS THE STATE
June 27, 2025
LEEDO PRESIDENTIAL MOTEL LTD. VS BANK OF THE NORTH LIMITED AND ANOR
June 27, 2025
KAYODE IDOWU VS THE STATE
June 27, 2025
LEEDO PRESIDENTIAL MOTEL LTD. VS BANK OF THE NORTH LIMITED AND ANOR
June 27, 2025
Show all

BALLA UMARU & ANOR VS ABDUL MUTALLABI & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1998) Legalpedia (SC) 73760

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 17, 1998

Suit Number: SC 37/1992

CORAM


MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ABUBAKAR B. WALI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

EMMANUEL O. OGWUEGBU JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


BALA UMARUBINTA UMARU APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

Bidda who came from the West entered the house of Mallam Maikara which he inherited from his father Inuwa, her claim was that the same house also belong to her father Dalha.


HELD


The appeal was allowed.


ISSUES


1. Whether the Court of Appeal was right in taking the issue of the ages of witnesses of the appellants before the trial court suo motu, without hearing the parties and drawing the inference that the evidence of the appellants’ witnesses is unreliable and or suspect.

2. Whether the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the possession of the properties by Inuwa for a period of 22 years could not be a ground for a claim of hauzi long possession and or prescription in Muslim law.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


TREATMENT OF THE COURT TO ISSUE(S) RAISED SUO MOTU BY AN APPELLATE COURT


“An appellate court should not ordinarily suo motu raise an issue or issues which the parties do not raise, but if so raised, no decision should be based on the same unless the parties or their counsel are afforded the opportunity of being heard.” Wali, JSC.


CASES CITED


1. Din v. A.-G. of the Federation (1988)9 S.C.19;(1988) 4 NWLR (Pt. 84)147 at 150
2. Mogaji v. Cadbury Nig. Ltd. (1985) 2 NWRL (Pt. 7) 393
3. A.-G. of Ova State v. Fairlakes Hotel Ltd. (1988) 12 SC(Pt. 1) 1; (1988) 12 SCNJ 1;(1988) 5 NWLR (Pt.92) 1
4. Odiase & Anor. v. Agho & Ors. (1972) 1 All NLR (Pt. 1) 170 at 176
5. Juwo v. Shehu & I Or. (1992) 8 NWLR (Pt.258) 129; (1992) 10 SCNJ 26 at 31 .


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None.


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.