YESUFU OGEDENGBE & ORS V CHIEF J. B. BALOGUN & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

YESUFU OGEDENGBE & ORS V CHIEF J. B. BALOGUN & ORS

ENYIBROS FOODS PROCESSING COMPANY LTD & ANOR V NIGERIAN DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
June 4, 2025
DR. BASIL EJIDIKE V. LIONEL OGUEJIOFOR
June 4, 2025
ENYIBROS FOODS PROCESSING COMPANY LTD & ANOR V NIGERIAN DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
June 4, 2025
DR. BASIL EJIDIKE V. LIONEL OGUEJIOFOR
June 4, 2025
Show all

YESUFU OGEDENGBE & ORS V CHIEF J. B. BALOGUN & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2007) Legalpedia (SC) 12135

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Mar 30, 2007

Suit Number: S.C. 273/2001

CORAM


WALTER SAMUEL OKANU ONNOGHEN, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. YESUFU OGEDENGBE2. CHIEF OWOLABI OMOTORIOGUN3. MR. ALUGBO ABERE4. MR. AUGUSTINE ATARI5. MR. AMOS ALARI6. MR. OGIDI EZEKIEL7. MR. ALABI OBE. APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The respondent claimed against the appellants a declaration that the land in dispute belonged to them, injunction and damages. Judgment was in favour of the respondent, the appellant appealed.


HELD


The Supreme Court held that the contradiction in the respondent (then plaintiff’s) evidence on the identity of the land in dispute was not fatal to their claims for declaration and injunction.


ISSUES


1.  Was the Court below right to have held that the apparent contradiction in the Respondents (then Plaintiff’s) evidence on the identity of the land in dispute was not fatal to the claims for declaration of title and injunction.2.  Was the Court below right to have refused to order a retrial in view of the failure of the trial court to evaluate vital evidence.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


NATURE OF SURVEY PLAN


“Even where it is not reasonably possible to ascertain the location or identity or boundaries of the land in dispute, the production of a Survey plan, may be an answer to provide a solution to the problem.” – Per I.F. OGBUAGU, JSC


WHEN WILL THE COURT ORDER A RETRIAL IN A CLAIM FOR DECLARATION OF TITLE?


“it is only where a plaintiff, has failed totally, to prove his case and there is substantial irregularity apparent on the Record or shown to the Court, that an order for retrial will be made. But this is not the case in the instant case leading to this appeal.” Per I.F. OGBUAGU, JSC


NEED TO ASCERTAIN THE IDENTITY OF DISPUTED LAND.


“Before a declaration of title is given, the land which it relates, must be ascertained with certainty. The test being whether a Surveyor, can from the record, produce an accurate plan.” Per I.F. OGBUAGU, JSC


DECLARATION OF TITLE – ONUS ON PLAINTIFF


“In a claim for declaration of title to land, (as in the instant case leading to this appeal) the onus is on the plaintiff to prove title to a defined area to which a declaration, can be attached.” Per I.F. OGBUAGU, JSC


WHAT ORDERS WILL THE COURT MAKE WHERE THE PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO PROVE HIS CASE


“Where a plaintiff in an action for declaration of title, fails to prove the boundaries of the land he is claiming, he has failed by that omission, to prove his case and the proper order which the court should make in such circumstances, is usually one of dismissal of the claim.” Per I.F. OGBUAGU, JSC


CASES CITED


NONE


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.