OGLI OKO MEMORIAL FARMS LIMITED & ANOR V NIGERIAN AGRICULTURAL AND CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

OGLI OKO MEMORIAL FARMS LIMITED & ANOR V NIGERIAN AGRICULTURAL AND CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED

WEST AFRICAN EXAMINATION COUNCIL V OMODOLAPO YEMISI ADEYANJU
May 30, 2025
PROF. AJIBAYO AKINKUGBE V EWULUM HOLDINGS NIGERIA LTD & ANOR
May 30, 2025
WEST AFRICAN EXAMINATION COUNCIL V OMODOLAPO YEMISI ADEYANJU
May 30, 2025
PROF. AJIBAYO AKINKUGBE V EWULUM HOLDINGS NIGERIA LTD & ANOR
May 30, 2025
Show all

OGLI OKO MEMORIAL FARMS LIMITED & ANOR V NIGERIAN AGRICULTURAL AND CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2008) Legalpedia (SC) 41311

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Apr 11, 2008

Suit Number: SC. 249/2001

CORAM


NIKI TOBI, JUSTICE ,SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. OGLI OKO MEMORIAL FARMS LIMITED2. CHIEF ADEJO OGIRI. APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The trial court granted the respondents’ counter claim after counsel to the respondent withdrew his appearance for the appellant. There was nothing in the records to show that the motion to file the defence and counter claim was moved and granted.


HELD


The court allowed the appeal and held that the appellant’s right to fair hearing was breached.


ISSUES


1. Were the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal in their majority decision, right in their view that the judgment in respect of the counter claim is valid in law?2. Were the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal in the majority decision, right in their view that the appellants’ right to fair hearing was not breached in the circumstances of this case?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


THE FUNDAMENTAL NATURE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF FAIR HEARING TO ALL COURT PROCEEDINGS


The principle of fair hearing is fundamental to all court procedure and proceedings. Like jurisdiction, the right to fair hearing is both fundamental and a constitutional right of every party to a dispute who is to be afforded an opportunity to present his case to the- Akintan J.S.C


AN APPELLATE COURT CAN ONLY ACT ON THE RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS UNLESS IMPEACHED


Any person who is contending that the record of proceedings before an appellate court is not a fair record of what happened at the court of first instance must first formally impeach the record of proceedings. Where the record of proceedings is not formally impeached, it is not open to the appellate court to speculate that other things happened in the trial court which were not recorded in the record of proceedings- ONNOGHEN J.S.C


CASES CITED


1. Ekpeto v. Wanogho (2004) 18 NWLR (Pt. 905) 394, (2004) 9-12 (Pt 2) SCM 36;2. Salu v. Egeibon (1994) 6 NWLR (Pt. 348) 23;3. Ceekay Traders v. G.M. Co. Ltd. (1992) 2 NWLR (Pt. 222) 132;4. Isiyaku Mohammed v. Kano N. A. (1968) 1 All NLR 424;5. U.B.A Ltd. v. Achoru (1990) 6 NWLR (Pt. 156) 254


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT 

Comments are closed.