GABRIEL NTIA vs. FFORDIAC ENGINEERING CO. LIMITED - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

GABRIEL NTIA vs. FFORDIAC ENGINEERING CO. LIMITED

MORTGAGES PHB LTD & ANOR v. DR OLADIPO OLASIMBO & ORS
April 13, 2025
TUNWASHE KABIRU vs. THE STATE
April 13, 2025
MORTGAGES PHB LTD & ANOR v. DR OLADIPO OLASIMBO & ORS
April 13, 2025
TUNWASHE KABIRU vs. THE STATE
April 13, 2025
Show all

GABRIEL NTIA vs. FFORDIAC ENGINEERING CO. LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2017) Legalpedia (CA) 99591

In the Court of Appeal

Tue Nov 21, 2017

Suit Number: CA/L/967/2013

CORAM



PARTIES


GABRIEL NTIA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Claimant now 1st Respondent is a limited liability company which invested in the Defendants/Appellant and 2nd Respondent, an investment outfit. The Appellant is the Managing Director and alter ego of the 2nd Respondent. An investment account was opened on behalf of the 1st Respondent with the sum of N 200,000,000 for six months tenure at a 20% interest rate, at the expiration of which several demands were made and meetings held demanding payment of the 1st Respondent’s investment. The Appellant defaulted in repaying the sum and it culminated in a Memorandum of Understanding wherein it was agreed that the transfer of properties which was assessed at N170, 000,000.00 (One Hundred and Seventy Million Naira Only), shall be assigned and shall constitute a part settlement of the Company’s indebtedness to the investor. It was further agreed that the outstanding sum of N30, 000,000.00(Thirty Million) payable by the Company to the investor would be paid in two installments. Part of the sum was paid leaving a balance of N10 million which was yet to be paid despite repeated demands hence, the 1st Respondent instituted an action in the High Court of Lagos claiming against the Defendants jointly and severally the sum of N10,000,000.00(Ten Million Naira Only) being the outstanding balance of the indebtedness of the Defendants to the Claimant, interest on the said sum at the rate of 21% per annum till judgement is delivered and thereafter a post judgement interest of 15% per annum until the final liquidation of the judgement debts by the Defendants. The processes were served through an order of substituted service by pasting at the Appellant’s place of business but he contended that he has since relocated his business from the address and was unaware of the suit despite the order for substituted service. The court in entering a summary judgement against him, granted the 1st Respondent’s prayers. The Appellant has appealed against the trial court judgement.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


Ø  Whether from the processes filed by the 1st Respondent, privity of contract, dispute or cause of action was declared.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Companies and Allied Matters Act, 1990


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.