KAFENE JEDDO VS AGHARIMUAYIRE IMIKO - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

KAFENE JEDDO VS AGHARIMUAYIRE IMIKO

ESTHER A. OSHO & ORS VS GABRIEL A. PHILLIPS & ORS
August 22, 2025
ADELAKUN AYINDE & ORS VS THE STATE
August 22, 2025
ESTHER A. OSHO & ORS VS GABRIEL A. PHILLIPS & ORS
August 22, 2025
ADELAKUN AYINDE & ORS VS THE STATE
August 22, 2025
Show all

KAFENE JEDDO VS AGHARIMUAYIRE IMIKO

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 12083

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Thu Mar 30, 1972

Suit Number: SC.83/69

CORAM


LEWIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MADARIKAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


KAFENE JEDDO (M)ROBERT JEDDO (M) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff claims against the defendants possession of the piece or parcel of land known and described as Egodo Uruetsone (Uruetsones Compound) at Ukpokiti Quarters, Agbassa, Warri and an injunction restraining the defendants.


HELD


It was held that the doctrine of relation back does not apply because plaintiff claimed in her writ as next of kin of the deceased.


ISSUES


Whether the doctrine of relation back applies?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


IMPORTANCE OF LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION


Letters of administration must issue before the commencement of legal proceedings by an administrator; for he has no right of action until he has obtained them, and even if he obtains a grant afterwards, it does not relate back- Sir Ian Lewis, JSC


CASES CITED


Bowler v. John Mowlem & Co. (1954) 1 WLR 1445

Finnegan v. Cementation Co. Ltd. (1953) 1 QB 688

Hilton v. Sutton Steam Laundry

In the Goods of Pryse (1904) p. 301 at 305)

Stebbings v. Holst & Co., Ltd. (1953) WLR


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Administration of Estates Law (Cap. 1 of the Laws of the Western Region of Nigeria, 1959)

Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1934

The English Supreme Court in the 1970 Annual Practice

The Fatal Accidents Acts and the Law Reform (Miscellanous Provisions) Act, 1934


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.