Just Decided Cases

ZENITH BANK v. JOHNSON A. AKINNIYI

Legalpedia Citation: (2015) Legalpedia (CA) 11130

In the Court of Appeal

Fri May 15, 2015

Suit Number: CA/AK/17/2014

CORAM


T.N.ORJI ABADUA- JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

T.N.ORJI ABADUA- JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL

SONTOYE DENTON-WEST – JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL

MOHAMMED AMBI-USI DANJUMA  -JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEAL

T.N.ORJI ABADUA- JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL


PARTIES


ZENITH BANK   APPELLANTS


JOHNSON A. AKINNIYI RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Defendant/Appellant applied for an order dismissing suit No: AK/105/2013 at the lower court on the ground that it constitutes abuse of Court process because the subject-matter and the parties are the same with the subject- matter of suit No: AK/350/2012 that is pending in the same court. After considering the affidavit evidence of both parties, the lower court dismissed the application on the grounds that suit No: AK/105/2013 is not an abuse of court process. Dissatisfied with the decision of the trial court, the Appellant filed a notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


Whether the learned trial judge was right in holding that Suit No: AK/105/2013 does not constitute an abuse of court process having held that the Respondent filed two separate suits No. AK/350/2012 and AK/105/2013 on the same subject matter, issues and between the same parties.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


BURDEN OF PROOF – THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON HE WHO ASSERTS


“In our adversary system of administration of justice, the burden of proof is on the party who asserts a fact to prove same, for he who asserts must prove. See: Daodu v. N.N.P.C (1998) 2 NWLR (Pt.538) 355, Itauma v. Akpe-Ime (2000) 7 SC (Pt.II) 24, Braimah v. Abasi (1998) 13 NWLR (Pt.581) 167 and Kala v. Potiskum (1998) 3 NWLR (Pt.540).”PER J.S ABIRIYI, J.C.A.


ADMISSIBILITY OF PUBLIC DOCUMENT – THE ONLY ADMISSIBLE SECONDARY EVIDENCE OF A PUBLIC DOCUMENT IS A CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT


“It is the law that the only secondary evidence of a public document admissible is a certified true copy of the document. It is immaterial whether the secondary evidence is for use in an interlocutory application or a substantive suit. It remains inadmissible in both situations unless it is certified. See: Fawehinmi v. I.G.P. (2000) FWLR (Pt.12) 2015 and Delta State House Of Assembly Ors v. PDP & 3 ORS (2014) LPELR 22808.” PER J.S ABIRIYI, J.C.A.


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO


Evidence Act 2011


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

MRS. MUBO IKOTUN V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2015) Legalpedia (CA) 11657 In the Court of Appeal Wed May 13, 2015…

3 weeks ago

MR. JOHN BIGWAN V. URBAN HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2015) Legalpedia (CA) 21101 In the Court of Appeal Fri May 15, 2015…

3 weeks ago

FRIDAY CHRISTOPHER v. THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2015) Legalpedia (CA) 40148 In the Court of Appeal Fri May 15, 2015…

3 weeks ago

IFEANYI CHIYENUM BLESSING V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2015-05) Legalpedia (SC) 19711 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri May 15,…

3 weeks ago

ILODIBE UCHE V. THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2015-05) Legalpedia (SC) 21151 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri May 15,…

3 weeks ago

ENAYE SISAMI RICHARD ABAH V ERIBO MONDAY & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2015-05) Legalpedia (SC) 91631 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri May 15,…

3 weeks ago