Just Decided Cases

YESUFU OBA VS S.A.B. EGBERONGBE

Legalpedia Citation: (1999) Legalpedia (SC) 72315

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jun 4, 1999

Suit Number: SC. 240/1992

CORAM


MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SAMSON ODEMWINGIE UWAIFO JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MAMMAN NASIR


PARTIES


YESUFU OBA APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

This appeal is from the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant the appellant’s application for orders granting extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal, leave to appeal and extension of time within which to appeal. The appellant/defendant in an action brought against him by the respondent/plaintiff, in the High Court whereby he was liable to the respondent in trespass, and an injunction was ordered against him from committing further trespass on land. The appellant’s appeal to the Court of Appeal having failed, the appellant brought an application to the High Court with the objective of having the court pronounce that the injunction ordered related to an area of land described on the plan which he had put before the court. The trial judge dismissed the application. The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal dismissed the application. The appellant further appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


APPEAL DISMISSED


ISSUES


The learned justices of the Court of Appeal were in error when they failed to consider the merits of the application before them.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


WHAT IS EXPECTED OF A PARTY WHO SOUGHT LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM A FINAL DECISION


“A party who conceives that he has, in error, sought leave to appeal from a decision which he regards as a final decision, when such was not needed, should proceed to appeal as of right, if he was still within time, or seek leave to appeal out of time if not within time, rather than appeal from a ruling refusing leave.” Per AYOOLA, J.S.C


FACTORS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO APPEAL


“The crucial factors to take into consideration in granting extension of time within which to appeal are whether there are good reasons for failure to appeal in time and whether there are good grounds of appeal. Both must coexist. Where either or both of these factors do not exist, the court cannot rely on an alleged peculiarity and importance of the case lo exercise a discretion to extend time within which to apply for leave to appeal or, as the case may be, the appeal.” Per AYOOLA, J.S.C


CASES CITED


Saraki & Ors. v. Kotoye [1992] 9 NWLR. N.S.C.C. 331


STATUTES REFERRED TO


NONE


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

4 weeks ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

4 weeks ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

4 weeks ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 weeks ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 weeks ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

4 weeks ago