UZOSIKE NWOKORONKWO VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

UZOSIKE NWOKORONKWO VS THE STATE

ALI SAFE VS NORTHERN STATES MARKETING BOARD
August 26, 2025
MRS. S.A. KAREEM & ORS VS DAVID O. OGUNDE & ANOR
August 26, 2025
ALI SAFE VS NORTHERN STATES MARKETING BOARD
August 26, 2025
MRS. S.A. KAREEM & ORS VS DAVID O. OGUNDE & ANOR
August 26, 2025
Show all

UZOSIKE NWOKORONKWO VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 15617

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jan 28, 1972

Suit Number: SUIT No: SC.166/1971

CORAM


COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


UZOSIKE NWOKORONKWO APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

Mr. E.O Enahoro signed the letter under which a recommendation was made for the land in dispute between the parties to be settled under the Inter-Tribal Boundaries Settlement Ordinance. There were findings stated in the letter which favoured the defendant and Mr. E.O Enahoro was appointed to carry out the enquiry.


HELD


The court held that there was a likelihood of bias and that his findings were therefore contrary to natural justice and unconstitutional.


ISSUES


whether it was proper that Mr Enahoro, after signing the letter of recommendation, should conduct the inquiry under the Inter- Tribal Boundaries Settlement Law, Laws of the Western Region of Nigeria, 1959.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


BIAS


In the rare cases where it could be proved that a decision had actually been affected by the bias of the person making it, that would no doubt be conclusive, but while suspicion is not enough the courts do not appear to have required proof that actual bias operated on the mind of the person making the decision. Per Brett J.S.C


CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTER-TRIBAL BOUNDARIES SETTLEMENT LAW


An officer conducting an inquiry under the Inter-Tribal Boundaries Settlement Law may not be bound by the Evidence Act, and may be entitled to give weight to matters which would not be treated as relevant in a court of law, but if he is to give a judicial decision he must approach the inquiry with an open mind, and he ought not to presume in advance that any particular solution is the right one. Per Brett J.S.C


CASES CITED


Anjoku and Anor. v. Nnamani (1953) 14 W.A.C.A. 357

R. v. Tempest (1902) 86 L.T. 585

Franklin v. Minister of Town Planning [1947] 1All E.R. 612, 619

Durayappah v. Fernando [1967] 2 All E.R. 152

Obadara v. President, lbadan West District Grade B Customary Court (1965) N.M.L.R. 39


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Constitution of the Federation 1963


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.