Just Decided Cases

UNION HOMES SAVINGS AND LOANS PLC. vs. BLUE WING TRAVEL AND TOURS

Legalpedia Citation: (2017) Legalpedia (CA) 95911

In the Court of Appeal

Fri Jun 9, 2017

Suit Number: CA./L/1198/2015

CORAM


BIOBELE ABRAHAM GEORGEWILL

ABIMBOLA OSARUGUE OBASEKI ADEJUMO


PARTIES


UNION HOMES SAVINGS AND LOANS PLC. APPELLANTS


BLUE WING TRAVEL AND TOURS  RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Claimant/Respondent applied for a loan facility to the tune of sum of N1, 125, 000. 00 from the Defendant/Appellant for the purchase of an office space located at  Sura Shopping Complex, Simpson Street, Lagos which was being sold by the Lagos State Development and Property Corporation (LSDPC) to all its sitting tenants including the Respondent. Subsequently, the Claimant/Respondent and the Defendant/Appellant entered an agreement wherein it was agreed that the Claimant/Respondent open an account with it and pay into the account the sum of N50, 000.00 as service charge and an equity contribution of 25% of the purchase price of the office space, to which the Claimant/Respondent obliged. The Defendant/Appellant on the other hand failed to fulfill its part of the agreement, as it failed to purchase the office space on behalf of the Claimant/Respondent. the Claimant/Respondent was disgracefully ejected from the office space on the ground that no payment was received from the Defendant/Appellant on behalf of the Claimant/Respondent by the LSDPC. The Claimant/Respondent, hence instituted an action for specific performance  and general damages against the Defendant/Appellant. The trial court after hearing argument of parties, held in favour of the Claimant/Respondent. Dissatisfied, the Defendant/Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal.


HELD


Appeal Dismissed


ISSUES


?    Whether there was a binding contract between the Appellant and the Respondent in respect of a Mortgage loan to purchase the office space occupied by the Respondent at Suite 321 Block A2-11, Sura Shopping Complex, Simpson Street, Lagos?” (Distilled from Grounds 1, 2 & 3)?    Whether the Respondent had discharged the evidential burden -of proof to warrant award of damages?” (Distilled from Ground 4)


RATIONES DECIDENDI


CASES CITED



STATUTES REFERRED TO



CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RUFUS ISAAC V OHN ODIGIE IMASUEN

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 11116 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jan 29,…

4 hours ago

ZAKI MAMMAN & ORS V MALL. DAN HAJO

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 18161 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jan 29,…

4 hours ago

DANIEL OKAFOR V THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 63952 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Jan 29,…

5 hours ago

SHELL PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF NIGERIA LIMITED V SAM ROYAL HOTEL NIGERIA LIMITED

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 46151 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Feb 5,…

5 hours ago

DR. OLUBUKOLA ABUBAKAR SARAKI V FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 10011 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Feb 5,…

5 hours ago

EDWARD NKWEGU OKEREKE V NWEZE DAVID UMAHI & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2016) Legalpedia (SC) 81399 In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Fri Feb 5,…

5 hours ago