Just Decided Cases

TRUSTEES NIG. RAILWAY CORP. PENSIONS FUND V. ISAIAH AINA

Legalpedia Citation: (1970) Legalpedia (SC) 15346

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Wed Jul 1, 1970

Suit Number: SC 105/1968

CORAM


COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

LEWIS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

SOWEMIMO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


TRUSTEES NIG. RAILWAY CORP. PENSIONS FUND APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The plaintiffs claimed a declaration that the defendant was entitled to claim a part of six months salary or a fair assessment of the loss occasioned by the inadequate notice of his termination of employment. The defendant on the other hand filed a motion asking the High Court to strike out the case on the ground that the matter had been decided by arbitration.


HELD


The Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that the Defendant was asking the Court to hear a preliminary objection why the action should not be heard at all and this was a quite different submission which could only be raised by demurrer under the Rules of Court in force and within the appropriate time, and it was not.


ISSUES


Whether the learned trial Judge was wrong to treat the defendants objection as a demurrer


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RIGHT OF THE DEFENDANT TO RELY ON A LEGAL POINT IN HIS DEFENCE TO HEAR A PRELIMINARY POINT


“A defendant is however perfectly entitled to rely upon any legal point in his defence and if he can persuade the court to hear a preliminary point at issue between the parties on the basis that to do so will dispose of the action then in the discretion of the trial judge it could be done.” Per LEWIS, JSC


WHEN A JUDGE CAN CONSENT TO HEARING OF A PRELIMINARY ISSUE BEFORE THE ACTION IS HEARD IN FULL


“It is only in exceptional cases and when it is absolutely clear that it is likely to dispose of the action that a Judge should consent to a hearing of a preliminary Issue even on a point of law before the action is heard in full – such points could always be taken in the course of the hearing of the action if there is any doubt whether hearing a preliminary issue will dispose of the matter.” Per LEWIS, JSC


CASES CITED


Atugbue v. Chime (1963) 1 All N.L.R. 208

Windsor Refrigerator Co. Ltd. v. Branch Nominees Ltd. (1961) Ch. 375


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Lagos High Court Rules


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

1 week ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

1 week ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

1 week ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

1 week ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

1 week ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

1 week ago