THE STATE & ORS VS MOMODU OLADELE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

THE STATE & ORS VS MOMODU OLADELE

MANDILAS & KARABERIS LTD VS J. O. ORIDOTA
August 26, 2025
AGHORO EJENAVWO VS THE STATE PAGE 1
August 26, 2025
MANDILAS & KARABERIS LTD VS J. O. ORIDOTA
August 26, 2025
AGHORO EJENAVWO VS THE STATE PAGE 1
August 26, 2025
Show all

THE STATE & ORS VS MOMODU OLADELE

Legalpedia Citation: (1972) Legalpedia (SC) 01100

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Feb 11, 1972

Suit Number: SC. 150/71

CORAM


ANTHONY NNAMEZIE ANIAGOLU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

COKER, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

LEWIS, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

UDOMA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

EMANUEL OBIOMA OGWUEGBU, JSC. JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT (Read the Leading Judgment)


PARTIES


MOMODU OLADELEJIMOH AJAO AMOO alias OLOJUKANJIMOH ATANDA ATUFAFAASIFATU ISHOLA APPELLANTS


COMPLAINANT / RESPONDENT


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants all participis criminis, were found guilty and sentenced to death for murder of one Olajide Olayiwola, the Shoun of Ogbomosho, who was murdered in cold blood in his palace during a revolt. The appellants, later appeal to the western state Court of Appeal to set aside their conviction, though the conviction and sentence of the 5th Accused was set aside by the appellate court but the conviction and sentence other appellants was upheld.


HELD


The court held that the conviction and the sentence of the appellants by the trial court in the face of overwhelming evidence against them for the offence of murder was proper in the circumstance.


ISSUES


Whether the appellate court was right in upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellants.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


HOW EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LOWER COURT IS TREATED BY AN APPELLATE COURT


where there was overwhelming evidence before the trial court to sustain the conviction and sentence of the appellants for the offence charged, an appellate court will not interfere with the findings of the lower court.
Per Fatayi Williams JSC


HOW EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LOWER COURT IS TREATED BY AN APPELLATE COURT


where there was overwhelming evidence before the trial court to sustain the conviction and sentence of the appellants for the offence charged, an appellate court will not interfere with the findings of the lower court.
Per Fatayi Williams JSC
<foo< p=””></foo<>


CASES CITED


None


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.