THE QUEEN VS AZU A. OWOH & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

THE QUEEN VS AZU A. OWOH & ORS

CHIEF SHITTU OGUNREMI & ORS VS D. ASIYANBI & ORS
September 4, 2025
THE QUEEN VS CHUKWUJI OBIASA
September 4, 2025
CHIEF SHITTU OGUNREMI & ORS VS D. ASIYANBI & ORS
September 4, 2025
THE QUEEN VS CHUKWUJI OBIASA
September 4, 2025
Show all

THE QUEEN VS AZU A. OWOH & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1962-12) Legalpedia 74483 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden at Lagos

Fri Dec 14, 1962

Suit Number: SC 104/1961

CORAM


TAYLOR, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT

BRETT, JUSTICE SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


AZU A. OWOH AND ORS

APPELLANTS 


THE QUEEN AND ORS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CRIMINAL LAW— CHARGE—INFORMATION—APPEAL

 

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellants are three out of eight persons who were tried jointly in the High Court of Eastern Nigeria on an information in the name of the Director of Public Prosecu-tions of the Federation, signed on his behalf by a crown counsel in the public service of the Federation. The other five accused persons were acquitted.

 

 


HELD


Appeal allowed

 

 


ISSUES


Not Available

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


POWER OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS TO SIGN AN INFORMATION


‘The Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation had therefore no standing under sections 337 to 343 of the Criminal Procedure Act to sign an information in the present case, since it is common ground that no powers have been delegated to him under section 47(4) of the Constitution of East-ern Nigeria, and that he has not been designated as a person authorised to sign an information under section 341 of the Criminal Procedure Act.’ Per BRETT F.J.

 

 


CASES CITED


Not Available

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


1. The Criminal Code

2. The Constitu-tion of the Federation

3. The Nigeria (Constitu-tion) Order in Council, 1960

4. The Constitution of Eastern Nigeria

5. The Criminal Procedure Act

6. The Interpretation Act

7. The Federal Supreme Court Act, 1960

 

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.