T. M. ORUGBO V. BULARA UNA & ORS - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

T. M. ORUGBO V. BULARA UNA & ORS

KALU ONWUCHEKWA V. B.I.D. EZEOGU
June 18, 2025
EUGENE NNAEKWE EGESIMBA V. EZEKIEL ONUZURUIKE
June 18, 2025
KALU ONWUCHEKWA V. B.I.D. EZEOGU
June 18, 2025
EUGENE NNAEKWE EGESIMBA V. EZEKIEL ONUZURUIKE
June 18, 2025
Show all

T. M. ORUGBO V. BULARA UNA & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (2002) Legalpedia (SC) 10117

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Sep 20, 2002

Suit Number: SC. 112/98

CORAM


EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

NKI TOBI, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


1. T. M. ORUGBO2. THOMPSON ADINI(For themselves and on behalf of UREJU COMMUNITY) APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The lower court set aside the decision of the customary court on grounds of fair hearing in that the defendants were not made to plead individually to the claim, bias, etc.    ?


HELD


The court allowed the appeal and held that ethnic affinity of a trial judge to any of the parties without more does not constitute a likelihood of bias and that there was no breach of natural justice from the circumstances of the case.


ISSUES


Whether the respondents were given a fair hearing at the trial.Whether the composition of the Court constituted a bias against the respondents as held by the Court of Appeal.Whether there was a failure of invitation to the respondents to take part at the inspection exercise at the locus in quo.Whether the respondents were denied the opportunity to cross-examine the 1st Plaintiff/Appellant and his 4 witnesses and to testify for themselves.Whether the use of historical books by the trial court constituted a breach of fair hearing.?


RATIONES DECIDENDI


TRIBAL COMPOSITION; BASIS FOR BIAS


Tribal composition of the bench per se cannot be basis for the charge of bias or likelihood of bias, unless the aggrieved party shows by the conduct of the bench such bias or likelihood of bias – Tobi J.S.C.


CUSTOMARY COURTS ARE NOT BOUND TO FOLLOW EVIDENCE ACT


Customary Courts by the nature of their constitution or composition are not bound to follow strict and technical rules of evidence. They need not comply with the provisions of the Evidence Act in the judicial process. – Tobi J.S.C


CASES CITED


Ejidike v. Obiora (1951) 13 WACA 270; Chief Nwizuke v. Chief Eyeyok (1953) 14 WACA 345 Otapo v. Sunmonu (1987) 2 NWLR (Pt. 58) 587.R.N.H.W. v. Sama (1991) 2 NWLR (Pt. 171) 64;Egwu v. University of Port Harcourt (1995) 8 NWLR (Pt. 414) 419?


STATUTES REFERRED TO


The Evidence Act   ?


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.