Legalpedia Citation: (1964-11) Legalpedia 37840 (SC)

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Holden At Abuja

Fri Nov 27, 1964

Suit Number: SC 430/1964

CORAM


BRETT JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

BAIRAMIAN JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

COKER JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


SUNDAY OMEGA

APPELLANTS 


 THE STATE 

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


 CRIMINAL LAW-ROBBERY-BRIGANDAGE-ALIBI-ADJOURNMENT

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was convicted at the trial court of the offences of robbery and brigandage and has appealed against the conviction

 


HELD


The court held that no miscarriage of justice was occasioned by the refusal of the trial judge to adjourn the hearing of the case and accordingly dismissed the appeal

 


ISSUES


Whether the evidence of the 10th prosecution witness was reliable

Whether the identification parade was properly conducted

Whether the appellant had adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


ON RIGHT OF ACCUSED PERSON TO RESERVE HIS DEFENCE


‘An accused person is undoubtedly entitled to reserve his defence until the appropriate stage of his trial, but if he intends to call witnesses he must take timely steps to have them at his trial ready to give evidence at that stage-which means that he must summon them in advance, and that he cannot complain if, seeing that he has not summoned them, the trial court refuses to grant him an adjournment for the purpose of summoning witnesses when he is called upon for his defence. COKER, J.S.C

 


WHEN REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT MAY BE REFUSED


‘We cannot subscribe to the view that a Court of trial should adjourn the hearing at the instance of any party (be it the accused or the prosecution) when it is manifest that the application for such adjournment was made only for the purpose of delaying the proceedings, and a fortiori, when, as in this case, it was being made after a total inadvertence to the directions of a Court, a compliance with which would probably have obviated the necessity for any such application’. 

COKER, J.S.C 

 


CASES CITED


 ” (1) Danjuma Dan Buhari Rimin Auzinawa v. Kano Native Authority (1956) 1 FS.C.27

” Jalo Guri and Another v. Hadeiia Native Authority (1959) 4 F.S.C. 44

” Dixon Gokpa v. Inspector-General of Police [1961] All N.L.R. 423

” Thomas Sorunke v. The King (1946) A.C. 316

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


 ” Criminal Procedure Code Law 1960

” Constitution of Nigeria

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

legaladmin

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

6 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

6 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

6 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

6 months ago