Just Decided Cases

SUNDAY EMEZUE V. E.E.O. OKOLO & ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1978-05) Legalpedia (SC) 10111

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri May 26, 1978

Suit Number: SC. 291/1976

CORAM


OGUNDARE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

DANIEL O. IBEKWE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT br/>

MOHAMMED BELLO, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


SUNDAY EMEZUE

APPELLANTS 


1. E.E.O. OKOLO

2. C.N. NEDUM

3. ANTHONISUS

RESPONDENTS 


AREA(S) OF LAW


CRIMINAL LAW – UNLAWFUL DETENTION

 


SUMMARY OF FACTS

The Plaintiff claimed against the defendants jointly and severally the sum of £1,000,000.00 (N2,000,000.00) as special and general damages for unlawful detention in the police station at Umuahia.

 


HELD


The Court held that this appeal, therefore, succeeds and it is allowed. The judgment of the learned trial Judge dismissing the plaintiff/appellants claim on 28th September, 1973, including the order made by him as to costs, is set aside. Instead, we hereby order that the case be tried de novo before another judge of the High Court of Imo State, where the parties shall be at liberty to amend their pleadings if they are so advised.

The plaintiff/appellant is awarded the costs of this appeal assessed at N460.00 against the defendants/respondents. The costs of the retrial shall abide the result.

 


ISSUES


Whether, on the pleadings, there may be a case of unlawful detention of the plaintiff/appellant by the defendants/respondents in the Umuahia Police Station at the material time.

 


RATIONES DECIDENDI


RIGHT OF AN ACCUSED TO FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT


“…the person arrested can only be “retained in custody” if the offence is of a serious nature and even then, the person – “shall be brought before a court or Justice of the Peace having jurisdiction with respect to the offence ……….. as soon as practicable whether or not the police inquiries are completed.” Per A. Fatayi-Williams J.S.C.

 


AN APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT A STATEMENT OF CLAIM UNDER ORDER 33 RULE 19


“An application to strike out a statement of claim under Order 33 Rule 19, can only be granted if, and only if, –

(a) the claim discloses no cause of action against a defendant/applicant; or

(b) the claim is embarrassing, or scandalous or vexatious or an abuse of the process of the court.” Per A. Fatayi-Williams J.S.C.

 


CASES CITED


Woods v. Lyttleton & Ors. (1909) 25 LTB page 665.

 


STATUTES REFERRED TO


Eastern Nigeria High Court Rules (Cap. 61 of the Laws of Eastern Nigeria, 1963)

Criminal Procedure Act

Criminal Code

 


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Esther ORIAH

Recent Posts

RENCO NIGERIA LIMITED V Q OIL & GAS SERVICES LIMITED & ANOR

Legalpedia Citation: (2025-08) Legalpedia 42685 (CA) In the Court of Appeal PORT HARCORT Mon Aug…

2 months ago

ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE OF NIGER CONTRACTOR CO. OF NIGERIA VS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF KADUNA STATE

Legalpedia Citation: Legalpedia SC KIZW In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Thu Sep 11, 2025…

2 months ago

COMMISSONER OF POLICE, WESTERN REGION VS ALOYSIUS IGWE & 2 ORS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-01) Legalpedia 19912 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria Holden at Lagos…

2 months ago

CLEMENT AKRAN VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-02) Legalpedia 45350 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago

J. A. IREM VS OBUBRA DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 03348 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago

JOHN KHALIL KHAWAM AND CO VS K CHELLARAM AND SONS (NIGERIA)

Legalpedia Citation: (1960-03) Legalpedia 49115 (SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria HOLDEN AT LAGOS…

2 months ago