SOLOMON AKPAN VS THE STATE - Legalpedia | The Complete Lawyer - Research | Productivity | Health

SOLOMON AKPAN VS THE STATE

TAIYE OSHOBOJA VS ALH. SURAKATU J. AMUDA & ORS
July 10, 2025
TUNDE OSUNRINDE & ORS VS. MUTAIRU TOGUN AJAMOGUN & ORS
July 10, 2025
TAIYE OSHOBOJA VS ALH. SURAKATU J. AMUDA & ORS
July 10, 2025
TUNDE OSUNRINDE & ORS VS. MUTAIRU TOGUN AJAMOGUN & ORS
July 10, 2025
Show all

SOLOMON AKPAN VS THE STATE

Legalpedia Citation: (1992) Legalpedia (SC) 10026

In the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Fri Jul 10, 1992

Suit Number: SC. 225/1989

CORAM


A.G. KARIBI-WHYTE, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS AG. CHIEF JUSTICE, NIGERIA

BOLARINWA OYEGOKE BABALAKI JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

S. KAWU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT

E.O. OGWUEGBU, JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT


PARTIES


SOLOMON AKPAN APPELLANTS


RESPONDENTS


AREA(S) OF LAW



SUMMARY OF FACTS

The appellant was charged in the High Court with the murder of one Akpan Peter Udombang. After a trial, the learned trial Judge found the appellant guilty of murder as charged and sentenced him accordingly. The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal in which the Court of Appeal held the appeal to be lacking in merit, dismissed and affirmed the conviction and sentence of the trial High Court. The appellant further appealed to the Supreme Court.


HELD


The appeal was dismissed. The judgment of the court below was affirmed.


ISSUES


Whether the issues in the Respondent’s Brief of Argument attracting adverse comments by the Honorable Justices of the Court of Appeal and reformulated by them rendered the Brief defective and thereby occasioned a miscarriage of justice.

Whether the Court of Appeal was right in affirming the trial Judge’s findings of the extra-judicial statements of the appellant.

Whether the Court of Appeal was right in upholding the findings of the learned trial Judge rejecting the defenses of the appellant.


RATIONES DECIDENDI


DUTIES OF THE COURT


“It is trite that a “Court of Law does nothing in vain.” Per OMO, JSC


CASES CITED


None.


STATUTES REFERRED TO


None


CLICK HERE TO READ FULL JUDGMENT

Comments are closed.